Suppr超能文献

左主干冠状动脉支架置入术(有保护与无保护)患者的短期和中期临床结果研究

Study of Short and Intermediate Term Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Protected and Unprotected LMCA Stenting.

作者信息

Vyas Pooja M, Prajapati Jayesh S, Sahoo Sibasis S, Patel Iva Vipul, Deshmukh Jagjeet K, Patel Chirag, Singhal Roopesh

机构信息

Assistant Professor, Department of Cardiology, U.N. Mehta Institute of Cardiology and Research Centre, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.

Head and Professor, Department of Cardiology, U.N. Mehta Institute of Cardiology and Research Centre, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.

出版信息

J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Apr;11(4):OC29-OC33. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/21821.9716. Epub 2017 Apr 1.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Significant unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery (LMCA) disease is detected in 5%-7% of cases undergoing Coronary Angiography (CAG). Present guidelines have revealed the significance of anatomical location in left main artery stenosis and syntax scores for determination of Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE). Debate still persists over the best treatment regarding outcomes of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) and LMCA stenting for patients with LMCA disease.

AIM

Aim of the study was to evaluate short and intermediate term clinical outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) in LMCA disease in respect to mortality, Cerebrovascular Accidents (CVA), reinfarction, stent restenosis and need for repeat target lesion revascularization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From July 2013 to February 2015, 50 patients underwent LMCA stenting. All patients underwent detailed clinical assessment, detailed 2D echocardiographic assessment. Syntax score was calculated in all patients. Clinical in hospital and outpatient follow up was obtained at one, three, six, nine months and one year.

RESULTS

Mean age was 53.14±9.60 years. On CAG 16 (32%) patients had ostial LMCA lesion, 8 (16%) had mid LMCA lesion, distal LMCA was diseased in 6 (12%). In emergency situation, two bail out LMCA stenting were done for treatment of LMCA dissection. A total of 42 (84%) patients had low syntax score, 6 (12%) had intermediate and 2 (4%) had high syntax score. Only LMCA stenting was done in 22 (44%) patients, LMCA to Left Anterior Descending (LAD) stenting was done in 22 (44%) and LMCA to Left Circumflex (LCX) stenting was done in 6 (12%) patients. Drug-Eluting Stent (DES) was used in 35 (70%) cases while Bare-Metal Stent (BMS) was used in 15 (30%). An 8% mortality and 8% target lesion revascularization rate were observed in our study.

CONCLUSION

Our study revealed that LMCA stenting is a safe and feasible alternative mode of revascularization in selected patients. Patients most suitable for LMCA stenting in our study were those with isolated ostial/mid LMCA disease, with protected LMCA disease and those who underwent elective stenting procedure.

摘要

引言

在接受冠状动脉造影(CAG)的病例中,5%-7%被检测出存在严重的无保护左主干冠状动脉(LMCA)疾病。目前的指南已经揭示了左主干动脉狭窄的解剖位置和用于确定主要不良心脏事件(MACE)的Syntax评分的重要性。关于冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)和LMCA疾病患者的LMCA支架置入术的最佳治疗方案仍存在争议。

目的

本研究的目的是评估经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)在LMCA疾病中的短期和中期临床结果,包括死亡率、脑血管意外(CVA)、再梗死、支架再狭窄以及再次进行靶病变血运重建的必要性。

材料和方法

2013年7月至2015年2月,50例患者接受了LMCA支架置入术。所有患者均接受了详细的临床评估和详细的二维超声心动图评估。计算所有患者的Syntax评分。在1个月、3个月、6个月、9个月和1年时进行住院和门诊临床随访。

结果

平均年龄为53.14±9.60岁。在CAG检查中,16例(32%)患者有LMCA开口病变,8例(16%)有LMCA中段病变,6例(12%)有LMCA远端病变。在紧急情况下,为治疗LMCA夹层进行了2例补救性LMCA支架置入术。共有42例(84%)患者Syntax评分低,6例(12%)患者Syntax评分中等,2例(4%)患者Syntax评分高。仅对22例(44%)患者进行了LMCA支架置入术,对22例(44%)患者进行了LMCA至左前降支(LAD)支架置入术,对6例(12%)患者进行了LMCA至左旋支(LCX)支架置入术。35例(70%)病例使用了药物洗脱支架(DES),15例(30%)病例使用了裸金属支架(BMS)。在我们的研究中观察到8%的死亡率和8%的靶病变血运重建率。

结论

我们的研究表明,LMCA支架置入术在选定患者中是一种安全可行的血运重建替代方式。在我们的研究中,最适合LMCA支架置入术的患者是那些孤立的LMCA开口/中段疾病患者、有保护的LMCA疾病患者以及接受择期支架置入手术的患者。

相似文献

1
Study of Short and Intermediate Term Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Protected and Unprotected LMCA Stenting.
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Apr;11(4):OC29-OC33. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/21821.9716. Epub 2017 Apr 1.
2
Single-stent crossover technique from distal unprotected left main coronary artery to the left circumflex artery.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Nov 1;82(5):757-64. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24988. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
5
Long-term clinical outcomes after unprotected left main coronary artery stenting in an all-comers patient population.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Oct 1;82(4):E411-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24861. Epub 2013 Mar 5.
8
The Cone Flare Crush Modified-T (CFCT) stenting technique for coronary artery bifurcation lesions.
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2020 Sep 25;30:100643. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2020.100643. eCollection 2020 Oct.
9
Treatment of patients with left main coronary artery disease.
Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2012 Feb;14(1):108-16. doi: 10.1007/s11936-011-0159-0.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Paclitaxel- versus sirolimus-eluting stents for unprotected left main coronary artery disease.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 May 12;53(19):1760-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.01.035.
6
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease.
N Engl J Med. 2009 Mar 5;360(10):961-72. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0804626. Epub 2009 Feb 18.
8
Revascularization for unprotected left main stem coronary artery stenosis stenting or surgery.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Mar 4;51(9):885-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.067.
9
Acute and late outcomes of unprotected left main stenting in comparison with surgical revascularization.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Feb 5;51(5):538-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.054.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验