Shochat Tamar, Barker David H, Sharkey Katherine M, Van Reen Eliza, Roane Brandy M, Carskadon Mary A
Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Cheryl Spencer Department of Nursing, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
J Sleep Res. 2017 Dec;26(6):709-717. doi: 10.1111/jsr.12550. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
Depressive mood in youth has been associated with distinct sleep dimensions, such as timing, duration and quality. To identify discrete sleep phenotypes, we applied person-centred analysis (latent class mixture models) based on self-reported sleep patterns and quality, and examined associations between phenotypes and mood in high-school seniors. Students (n = 1451; mean age = 18.4 ± 0.3 years; 648 M) completed a survey near the end of high-school. Indicators used for classification included school night bed- and rise-times, differences between non-school night and school night bed- and rise-times, sleep-onset latency, number of awakenings, naps, and sleep quality and disturbance. Mood was measured using the total score on the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale. One-way anova tested differences between phenotype for mood. Fit indexes were split between 3-, 4- and 5-phenotype solutions. For all solutions, between phenotype differences were shown for all indicators: bedtime showed the largest difference; thus, classes were labelled from earliest to latest bedtime as 'A' (n = 751), 'B' (n = 428) and 'C' (n = 272) in the 3-class solution. Class B showed the lowest sleep disturbances and remained stable, whereas classes C and A each split in the 4- and 5-class solutions, respectively. Associations with mood were consistent, albeit small, with class B showing the lowest scores. Person-centred analysis identified sleep phenotypes that differed in mood, such that those with the fewest depressive symptoms had moderate sleep timing, shorter sleep-onset latencies and fewer arousals. Sleep characteristics in these groups may add to our understanding of how sleep and depressed mood associate in teens.
青少年的抑郁情绪与不同的睡眠维度有关,如时间、时长和质量。为了识别不同的睡眠表型,我们基于自我报告的睡眠模式和质量应用了以人为中心的分析方法(潜在类别混合模型),并研究了高中高年级学生中这些表型与情绪之间的关联。学生(n = 1451;平均年龄 = 18.4 ± 0.3岁;648名男性)在高中快结束时完成了一项调查。用于分类的指标包括上学日的上床睡觉时间和起床时间、非上学日与上学日上床睡觉时间和起床时间的差异、入睡潜伏期、觉醒次数、午睡情况以及睡眠质量和干扰情况。使用流行病学研究中心抑郁量表的总分来测量情绪。单向方差分析测试了各表型在情绪方面的差异。拟合指数在三、四、五表型解决方案之间进行划分。对于所有解决方案,所有指标在各表型之间均显示出差异:上床睡觉时间差异最大;因此,在三分类解决方案中,从最早到最晚的上床睡觉时间将类别标记为“A”(n = 751)、“B”(n = 428)和“C”(n = 272)。类别B的睡眠干扰最低且保持稳定,而类别C和A在四分类和五分类解决方案中分别进行了细分。与情绪的关联是一致的,尽管较小,类别B的得分最低。以人为中心的分析确定了在情绪方面存在差异的睡眠表型,即抑郁症状最少的人睡眠时间适中、入睡潜伏期较短且觉醒次数较少。这些组中的睡眠特征可能有助于我们理解青少年的睡眠与抑郁情绪之间的关联。