Amitabh Chandra (
Michael Frakes is a professor at the Duke University School of Law, in Durham, North Carolina.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Jun 1;36(6):1041-1047. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1091.
More than fifty years after the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, health care for racial and ethnic minorities remains in many ways separate and unequal in the United States. Moreover, efforts to improve minority health care face challenges that differ from those confronted during de jure segregation. We review these challenges and examine whether stronger enforcement of existing civil rights legislation could help overcome them. We conclude that stronger enforcement of existing laws-for example, through executive orders to strengthen enforcement of the laws and congressional action to allow private individuals to bring lawsuits against providers who might have engaged in discrimination-would improve minority health care, but this approach is limited in what it can achieve. Complementary approaches outside the legal arena, such as quality improvement efforts and direct transfers of money to minority-serving providers-those seeing a disproportionate number of minority patients relative to their share of the population-might prove to be more effective.
1964 年《民权法案》通过五十多年后,在美国,医疗保健在很多方面仍然是针对少数族裔的,而且存在种族和民族差异,并不平等。此外,改善少数民族医疗保健的努力面临着与过去实施事实上的种族隔离时不同的挑战。我们审查了这些挑战,并探讨了加强现有民权立法的执行是否有助于克服这些挑战。我们的结论是,加强现有法律的执行力度——例如,发布行政命令加强法律执行,以及国会采取行动允许私人对可能存在歧视行为的提供者提起诉讼——将改善少数民族的医疗保健,但这种方法在所能实现的目标方面存在局限性。在法律领域之外采取补充措施,如质量改进措施和直接向为少数族裔服务的提供者(相对于其在人口中所占比例,为不成比例数量的少数族裔患者提供服务的提供者)转移资金,可能会被证明更加有效。