Wang Xiuping, Zhou Jinfang, Zhao Xin, Yi Xiongxiong
From the Department of Paediatrics, The People's Hospital of Yan'an, Yan'an, China.
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2018 Mar;34(3):160-164. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001184.
Although montelukast has an established role in the management of chronic asthma in children, its efficacy in acute asthma exacerbations (AAEs) in children aged 2 to 5 years is not fully known. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of montelukast for treating AAE in children aged 2 to 5 years in China.
In total, 120 Chinese children with AAE, aged 2 to 5 years, were randomly divided into 2 groups, each with 60 patients. All patients received either montelukast or placebo along with standard therapy for acute asthma between January 2011 and December 2015. The outcome measurements included the difference in peak expiratory flow and lung function improvements, as well as adverse events.
A total of 117 patients completed the study. Montelukast showed no greater effectiveness than did placebo in increasing the peak expiratory flow during the period of hospital stay (P = 0.92 at day 2, P = 0.86 at day 3, and P = 0.82 at day 4) and at discharge (P = 0.84). Similarly, the forced expiratory volume in 1 second at discharge also did not show significant difference between the 2 groups (P = 0.80). In addition, no serious adverse events were found during the intervention period of the study.
The results of this study demonstrate no benefit of montelukast over placebo in the treatment of AAE in a cohort of 2- to 5-year-old children.
尽管孟鲁司特在儿童慢性哮喘管理中具有既定作用,但其对2至5岁儿童急性哮喘加重(AAE)的疗效尚不完全清楚。本研究旨在评估孟鲁司特治疗中国2至5岁儿童AAE的有效性和安全性。
总共120名年龄在2至5岁的中国AAE儿童被随机分为2组,每组60例患者。在2011年1月至2015年12月期间,所有患者在接受急性哮喘标准治疗的同时,接受孟鲁司特或安慰剂治疗。观察指标包括呼气峰值流速差异、肺功能改善情况以及不良事件。
共有117名患者完成了研究。在住院期间(第2天P = 0.92,第3天P = 0.86,第4天P = 0.82)及出院时(P = 0.84),孟鲁司特在增加呼气峰值流速方面显示出并不比安慰剂更有效。同样,两组在出院时的1秒用力呼气量也没有显著差异(P = 0.80)。此外,在研究的干预期间未发现严重不良事件。
本研究结果表明,在治疗2至5岁儿童的AAE方面,孟鲁司特并不比安慰剂更具优势。