Experimental Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.
National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Eur J Heart Fail. 2017 Dec;19(12):1664-1671. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.873. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction is recognized as a major prognostic factor in left-sided heart failure (HF). However, the relative contribution of RV dysfunction in HF with preserved (HFpEF) vs. reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is unclear.
Right ventricular longitudinal strain (RVLS), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) and pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) were determined by echocardiography in 657 age- and gender-matched groups of patients with HFpEF [left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥50%; n=219] and HFrEF (LVEF <50%; n=219) and in controls without HF (n=219) from an Asian population-based cohort study. Across control to HFpEF and HFrEF groups, RV function deteriorated as measured by RVLS (-26.7 ± 5%, -22.7±6.6% and -18.2 ± 6.7%, respectively) and TAPSE (21.0 ± 3.9, 17.5 ± 5.1 and 14.7 ± 4.7 mm, respectively), whereas PASP increased (26.8 ± 7.1, 34.5 ± 11.9 and 39.3 ± 16.2 mmHg, respectively) (all P<0.001). Controlling for PASP in control, HFpEF and HFrEF subjects, the magnitude of RVLS/PASP (-1.06 ± 0.32, -0.75 ± 0.32 and -0.56 ± 0.36, respectively) and TAPSE/PASP ratios (0.83 ± 0.23, 0.54 ± 0.24 and 0.55 ± 0.29, respectively) similarly decreased across groups. Right ventricular dysfunction (by both TAPSE and RVLS) was independently associated with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and atrial fibrillation, but not with PASP. Among patients with HF, both TAPSE/PASP and RVLS/PASP ratios were related to the composite endpoint of all-cause death and HF hospitalization, even after multivariable adjustment [hazard ratio (HR) 0.33; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.14-0.74 and HR 3.09; 95% CI 1.52-6.26, respectively], with no difference between HFrEF and HFpEF.
Right ventricular dysfunction is present in HFpEF and is even more pronounced in HFrEF for any given degree of pulmonary hypertension. It is independently predicted by left ventricular dysfunction but not by PASP. Right ventricular-arterial coupling is prognostically important in HF regardless of LVEF.
右心室(RV)功能障碍被认为是左心衰竭(HF)的主要预后因素。然而,RV 功能障碍在射血分数保留性 HF(HFpEF)与射血分数降低性 HF(HFrEF)中的相对贡献尚不清楚。
通过超声心动图在亚洲人群队列研究中,在年龄和性别匹配的 657 例 HFpEF[左心室射血分数(LVEF)≥50%;n=219]和 HFrEF(LVEF<50%;n=219)患者和无 HF 的对照组患者(n=219)中分别确定 RV 纵向应变(RVLS)、三尖瓣环平面收缩期位移(TAPSE)和肺动脉收缩压(PASP)。在对照组到 HFpEF 和 HFrEF 组中,RV 功能随着 RVLS(分别为-26.7±5%、-22.7±6.6%和-18.2±6.7%)和 TAPSE(分别为 21.0±3.9、17.5±5.1 和 14.7±4.7mm)的降低而恶化,而 PASP 升高(分别为 26.8±7.1、34.5±11.9 和 39.3±16.2mmHg)(均 P<0.001)。在对照组、HFpEF 和 HFrEF 受试者中控制 PASP 后,RVLS/PASP(分别为-1.06±0.32、-0.75±0.32 和-0.56±0.36)和 TAPSE/PASP 比值(分别为 0.83±0.23、0.54±0.24 和 0.55±0.29)同样在各组之间降低。RV 功能障碍(通过 TAPSE 和 RVLS)与左心室收缩功能障碍和心房颤动独立相关,但与 PASP 无关。在 HF 患者中,TAPSE/PASP 和 RVLS/PASP 比值均与全因死亡和 HF 住院的复合终点相关,即使在多变量调整后也是如此[风险比(HR)0.33;95%置信区间(CI)0.14-0.74 和 HR 3.09;95%CI 1.52-6.26],HFpEF 和 HFrEF 之间无差异。
HFpEF 中存在 RV 功能障碍,在任何程度的肺动脉高压下,HFpEF 中的 RV 功能障碍甚至更为明显。它由左心室功能障碍独立预测,但不受 PASP 影响。无论 LVEF 如何,RV-动脉偶联在 HF 中均具有重要的预后意义。