Interian Alejandro, Chesin Megan, Kline Anna, Miller Rachael, St Hill Lauren, Latorre Miriam, Shcherbakov Anton, King Arlene, Stanley Barbara
Arch Suicide Res. 2018 Apr-Jun;22(2):278-294. doi: 10.1080/13811118.2017.1334610. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
Efforts to better understand and prevent suicide have increasingly pointed to the prospective assessment of suicidal behaviors in clinical trials. These assessments are aided by instruments such as the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS), which have sought to improve the conceptual uniformity and ease by which suicidal behaviors are classified. At the same time, assessment and classification of suicidal behaviors has been a longtime challenge in the field. To aid users of the C-SSRS, this article illustrates the use of the C-SSRS in instances where classification complexities arise. Illustrations are presented based on cases encountered during a clinical trial for a suicide prevention intervention. Key decision points are summarized and classification issues that warrant consideration for future refinement of such decisions are discussed.
为了更好地理解和预防自杀,人们越来越多地将重点指向在临床试验中对自杀行为进行前瞻性评估。这些评估借助了诸如哥伦比亚自杀严重程度评定量表(C-SSRS)等工具,这些工具致力于提高自杀行为分类的概念一致性和简便性。与此同时,自杀行为的评估和分类长期以来一直是该领域的一项挑战。为了帮助C-SSRS的使用者,本文阐述了在出现分类复杂性的情况下如何使用C-SSRS。文中基于一项自杀预防干预临床试验中遇到的案例进行说明。总结了关键决策点,并讨论了一些分类问题,这些问题值得在未来对此类决策进行完善时加以考虑。