Hill Jeremy, Janko Matthew, Angell Kelsey F, Day Kathy, Noujaim Michael G, Kalil Jennifer, Steele Scott R
Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.
J Surg Res. 2017 Jun 1;213:84-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.02.008. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
Studies on medicine wards have shown that numeric pages can be disruptive of workflow and patient care. We created a quality improvement program among surgical ward nurses and residents and hypothesized that a text-based, urgency-stratified initiative would improve communication at no detriment to patient care.
Surgery residents recorded preintervention data for 1 mo including number of total pages, text pages, and numeric pages received from surgical floors. Nurses and residents completed surveys to assess preintervention satisfaction with communication, responsiveness, and workflow. Nurses were then instructed to use text paging for nonurgent issues. Paging data were again recorded for 1 mo, surveys repeated, and patient safety and satisfaction data collected. Primary endpoints evaluated included patient safety and satisfaction data. Secondary endpoints included communication satisfaction of nurses and residents.
After text paging implementation, 40.1% of nonurgent pages sent from nurses to resident physicians were alphanumeric texts versus only 17.9% before implementation (P < 0.0001). There was a 19.5% reduction in the number of nonurgent numeric pages sent (P < 0.0001). Overall, 70% of nurses responded postintervention that text paging was the preferred method of contacting a physician and that the text paging initiative improved efficiency. After implementation, 62% of nurses thought that overall communication with clinicians improved. In addition, there was no change in patient safety issues or patient satisfaction.
Our text paging initiative for all nonurgent pages from nurses to residents improved physician-nurse workflow and communication on the surgical ward with no decrease in patient satisfaction or safety.
对内科病房的研究表明,数字传呼可能会扰乱工作流程和患者护理。我们在外科病房护士和住院医师中开展了一项质量改进项目,并假设基于文本的、按紧急程度分层的举措将改善沟通,且不会对患者护理造成损害。
外科住院医师记录了1个月的干预前数据,包括从外科楼层收到的总传呼次数、文本传呼次数和数字传呼次数。护士和住院医师完成了调查问卷,以评估干预前对沟通、响应能力和工作流程的满意度。然后,指导护士对非紧急问题使用文本传呼。再次记录1个月的传呼数据,重复进行调查,并收集患者安全和满意度数据。评估的主要终点包括患者安全和满意度数据。次要终点包括护士和住院医师的沟通满意度。
实施文本传呼后,护士发给住院医师的非紧急传呼中有40.1%是字母数字文本,而实施前仅为17.9%(P < 0.0001)。发出的非紧急数字传呼数量减少了19.5%(P < 0.0001)。总体而言,70%的护士在干预后表示,文本传呼是联系医生的首选方法,且文本传呼举措提高了效率。实施后,62%的护士认为与临床医生的总体沟通有所改善。此外,患者安全问题或患者满意度没有变化。
我们针对护士发给住院医师的所有非紧急传呼的文本传呼举措,改善了外科病房医生与护士的工作流程和沟通,且患者满意度和安全性并未降低。