Suppr超能文献

开展临床营养研究面临的挑战。

Challenges in conducting clinical nutrition research.

作者信息

Weaver Connie M, Miller Joshua W

机构信息

Department of Nutrition Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA. Department of Nutritional Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.

出版信息

Nutr Rev. 2017 Jul 1;75(7):491-499. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nux026.

Abstract

Clinical nutrition research has played a pivotal role in establishing causality between diet or nutrient intake and health outcome measures and in the determination of dietary requirements and levels of supplementation to achieve specific outcomes. Because the studies are performed with humans, clinical nutrition research can be readily translated into public health messages. However, there are many challenges and considerations unique to the field, such as the baseline nutritional status of study participants, defining appropriate control groups, effective blinding of participants and investigators, the evolving ethics of randomized control trials, and a tension in a priori decisions regarding inclusion of nutritionally vulnerable participants versus representative samples of general populations. Regulatory approvals that place increasing burdens on the ability of investigators to carry out and complete research protocols have grown dramatically in recent years. There is much room for improved efficiency in the approval and reporting processes aimed at protecting volunteers and providing transparency to the public. Decreased redundancy would have a direct benefit to clinical nutrition research and investigators. Despite these challenges, the information to be gained and the rewards of clinical nutrition research remain high.

摘要

临床营养研究在确立饮食或营养摄入与健康指标之间的因果关系,以及确定实现特定结果所需的膳食要求和补充水平方面发挥了关键作用。由于这些研究是在人体上进行的,临床营养研究成果能够很容易地转化为公共卫生信息。然而,该领域存在许多独特的挑战和需要考虑的因素,例如研究参与者的基线营养状况、确定合适的对照组、对参与者和研究者进行有效的盲法处理、随机对照试验不断演变的伦理问题,以及在关于纳入营养脆弱参与者与一般人群代表性样本的先验决策中存在的矛盾。近年来,监管审批给研究者执行和完成研究方案的能力带来了越来越大的负担。在旨在保护志愿者并向公众提供透明度的审批和报告过程中,提高效率仍有很大空间。减少冗余将直接有利于临床营养研究和研究者。尽管存在这些挑战,临床营养研究仍有望获得丰富的信息并带来丰厚回报。

相似文献

1
Challenges in conducting clinical nutrition research.
Nutr Rev. 2017 Jul 1;75(7):491-499. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nux026.
2
3
Perspective: Design and Conduct of Human Nutrition Randomized Controlled Trials.
Adv Nutr. 2021 Feb 1;12(1):4-20. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmaa109.
4
The challenges of control groups, placebos and blinding in clinical trials of dietary interventions.
Proc Nutr Soc. 2017 Aug;76(3):203-212. doi: 10.1017/S0029665117000350. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
5
Recommendations for Designing, Conducting, and Reporting Feeding Trials in Nutrition Research.
Adv Nutr. 2024 Oct;15(10):100283. doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2024.100283. Epub 2024 Aug 10.
6
The role of the institutional review board in the oversight of the ethical aspects of human studies research.
Nutr Clin Pract. 2013 Apr;28(2):177-81. doi: 10.1177/0884533612474042. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
7
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.026. Epub 2003 Apr 29.
8
Perspective: US Documentation and Regulation of Human Nutrition Randomized Controlled Trials.
Adv Nutr. 2021 Feb 1;12(1):21-45. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmaa118.
9

引用本文的文献

1
Consensus statement on exploring the Nexus between nutrition, brain health and dementia prevention.
Nutr Metab (Lond). 2025 Jul 25;22(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12986-025-00981-6.
3
6
The overlooked impact of background diet and adherence in nutrition trials.
medRxiv. 2025 Feb 26:2025.02.26.25322933. doi: 10.1101/2025.02.26.25322933.
7
Exploring how researchers consider nutrition trial design and participant adherence: a theory-based analysis.
Front Nutr. 2024 Dec 17;11:1457708. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1457708. eCollection 2024.
8
Vitamin D-Do Diet Recommendations for Health Remain Strong?
Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2024 Dec;22(6):523-535. doi: 10.1007/s11914-024-00893-z. Epub 2024 Oct 2.
9
A study protocol for a randomized clinical trial on exposure and effects of pesticides consumption - the PEST-EXPO Brazil study.
MethodsX. 2024 Aug 30;13:102942. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2024.102942. eCollection 2024 Dec.
10
Possible benefits of food supplementation or diet in scar management: A scoping review.
Scars Burn Heal. 2024 Sep 13;10:20595131241282105. doi: 10.1177/20595131241282105. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Equipoise in Research: Integrating Ethics and Science in Human Research.
JAMA. 2017 Feb 7;317(5):525-526. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.0016.
3
Addressing Current Criticism Regarding the Value of Self-Report Dietary Data.
J Nutr. 2015 Dec;145(12):2639-45. doi: 10.3945/jn.115.219634. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
4
Energy balance measurement: when something is not better than nothing.
Int J Obes (Lond). 2015 Jul;39(7):1109-13. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2014.199. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
7
Vitamin B-12 and folate status in relation to decline in scores on the mini-mental state examination in the framingham heart study.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Aug;60(8):1457-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04076.x. Epub 2012 Jul 12.
8
Folic acid food fortification-its history, effect, concerns, and future directions.
Nutrients. 2011 Mar;3(3):370-84. doi: 10.3390/nu3030370. Epub 2011 Mar 15.
9
Foods, fortificants, and supplements: Where do Americans get their nutrients?
J Nutr. 2011 Oct;141(10):1847-54. doi: 10.3945/jn.111.142257. Epub 2011 Aug 24.
10
Evidence-based criteria in the nutritional context.
Nutr Rev. 2010 Aug;68(8):478-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2010.00307.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验