Suppr超能文献

三种蚊细胞系对登革病毒分离的比较敏感性

Comparative sensitivity of three mosquito cell lines for isolation of dengue viruses.

作者信息

Kuno G, Gubler D J, Vélez M, Oliver A

出版信息

Bull World Health Organ. 1985;63(2):279-86.

Abstract

Comparative studies were carried out on three mosquito cell lines (C6/36 clone of Aedes albopictus, AP-61 from A. pseudoscutellaris, and TRA-284 from Toxorhynchites amboinensis) to determine their sensitivity to dengue virus isolation, growth, and handling characteristics for immunofluorescent testing. Virus isolation rates from human sera were the highest in the TRA-284-SF (a line adapted to serum-free medium), followed by the TRA-284 parental line and AP-61. Virus isolation was the lowest in the C6/36 line. All 3 cell lines were comparable in terms of ease of handling, but C6/36 cells were preferable for detecting infected cells by the direct fluorescent antibody test (DFAT) because of frequent cell clumping in the AP-61 and TRA-284 lines. Early detection of viral antigen of all 4 serotypes in the infected cells by DFAT was dependent upon the virus titre in the serum. The AP-61 and TRA-284-SF cells were the best for early detection and identification of viral antigen. Similarly, both AP-61 and TRA-284 cells were more resistant than C6/36 cells to toxic effects of human sera. Based on the economy of using the serum-free medium, their higher sensitivity for dengue virus isolation, and their ease of handling, it is recommended that the TRA-284-SF cell line be used for routine dengue virus isolation in laboratories with cell culture capability.

摘要

对三种蚊细胞系(白纹伊蚊的C6/36克隆株、伪盾伊蚊的AP-61以及amboinensis巨蚊的TRA-284)进行了比较研究,以确定它们对登革病毒分离、生长的敏感性以及用于免疫荧光检测的处理特性。TRA-284-SF(一种适应无血清培养基的细胞系)从人血清中分离病毒的比率最高,其次是TRA-284亲本细胞系和AP-61。C6/36细胞系中病毒分离率最低。所有三种细胞系在处理难易程度方面相当,但由于AP-61和TRA-284细胞系中细胞频繁聚集,C6/36细胞更适合通过直接荧光抗体试验(DFAT)检测感染细胞。通过DFAT在感染细胞中早期检测所有4种血清型的病毒抗原取决于血清中的病毒滴度。AP-61和TRA-284-SF细胞在早期检测和鉴定病毒抗原方面表现最佳。同样,AP-61和TRA-284细胞比C6/36细胞对人血清的毒性作用更具抗性。基于使用无血清培养基的经济性、它们对登革病毒分离的更高敏感性以及易于处理,建议在具备细胞培养能力的实验室中使用TRA-284-SF细胞系进行常规登革病毒分离。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

2
Zika virus isolation, propagation, and quantification using multiple methods.采用多种方法分离、增殖和定量寨卡病毒。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 30;16(7):e0255314. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255314. eCollection 2021.
3
Species: A Review of Current Knowledge.物种:当前知识综述。
Insects. 2020 Oct 30;11(11):747. doi: 10.3390/insects11110747.

本文引用的文献

6
The growth and serial passage of cell lines from Aedes aegypti (L.) larvae in different media.
J Med Entomol. 1969 Oct;6(4):432-9. doi: 10.1093/jmedent/6.4.432.
9
A method for the isolation and identification of dengue viruses, using mosquito cell cultures.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1979 Nov;28(6):1053-9. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1979.28.1053.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验