Program in Public Health, University of California, Irvine, California, USA.
Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Tob Control. 2018 Jul;27(4):463-469. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053473. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
Recent studies have separately examined the content and demographic reach of the advertising of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS). No study to our knowledge has linked the two in investigating whether racial/ethnic groups are differentially exposed to the comparative messages conveyed in online ENDS advertisements.
932 unique ENDS advertisements (6311 total), which were posted on 3435 websites between December, 2009 and October, 2015, were categorized as either comparative or non-comparative with respect to the traditional cigarette. The race/ethnicity of website visitors was obtained from a proprietary source and used in constructing variables for racial/ethnic viewership. The variables for advertising content and website racial/ethnic viewership were then linked yielding a final sample of 551 unique ENDS advertisements (2498 total) on 1206 websites. A two-level hierarchical generalized linear model, used in estimating website racial/ethnic viewership as a predictor of comparative advertising, accounted for the nesting of advertisements (level 1) within 152 ENDS brands (level 2).
In contrast to racial/ethnic minorities, a greater proportion of non-Hispanic whites visited websites with ENDS advertisements than the overall proportion of nonHispanic white U.S. Internet users. Yet, it was the advertisements on websites that appealed to Hispanics that had greater odds of comparing ENDS to traditional cigarettes.
The lower exposure to ENDS advertising among racial/ethnic minorities versus non-Hispanic whites is consistent with survey data. Yet, the greater odds of comparative advertising of ENDS on websites that appeal to racial/ethnic minorities (ie, Hispanics) could impact the longterm health of minority smokers.
This study's findings have important implications for the uptake of ENDS among minority smokers. If the comparative advertising yields greater interest and eventual use of ENDS, then minority smokers could either benefit from smoking cessation because they switch to ENDS, or adopt dual tobacco use. The fate of comparative advertising of ENDS versus the traditional cigarette will depend on the Food and Drug Administration enforcement of its deeming rules and the ensuing changes in the ENDS marketplace.
最近的研究分别考察了电子烟(ENDS)广告的内容和受众群体。据我们所知,尚无研究将这两者联系起来,以调查不同种族/族裔群体是否会接触到在线 ENDS 广告中传达的比较信息。
2009 年 12 月至 2015 年 10 月期间,在 3435 个网站上发布了 932 个独特的 ENDS 广告(共 6311 个),这些广告根据传统香烟分为比较性广告和非比较性广告。网站访问者的种族/族裔是从一个专有的来源获得的,并用于构建与种族/族裔观众有关的变量。然后,将广告内容和网站种族/族裔观众的变量进行链接,得出最终的样本,即 1206 个网站上的 551 个独特的 ENDS 广告(共 2498 个)。在估计网站种族/族裔观众作为比较广告的预测指标时,使用了两级层次广义线性模型,该模型考虑了广告(一级)嵌套在 152 个 ENDS 品牌(二级)中。
与少数民族相比,非西班牙裔白人访问包含 ENDS 广告的网站的比例高于非西班牙裔白人美国互联网用户的总体比例。然而,吸引西班牙裔人群的网站上的广告更有可能将 ENDS 与传统香烟进行比较。
与非西班牙裔白人相比,少数民族接触 ENDS 广告的机会较少,这与调查数据一致。然而,在吸引少数民族(即西班牙裔)的网站上,比较 ENDS 广告的几率更大,这可能会影响少数族裔吸烟者的长期健康。
这项研究的结果对少数民族吸烟者使用 ENDS 具有重要意义。如果比较广告产生了对 ENDS 的更大兴趣并最终使用,那么少数民族吸烟者可能会因为改用 ENDS 而戒烟,或者采用双重烟草使用。比较 ENDS 与传统香烟的广告的命运将取决于食品和药物管理局对其认定规则的执行情况,以及随之而来的 ENDS 市场的变化。