Li Haibin, Wang Yiran, Jiang Jiangling, Li Wei, Li Chunbo
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Psychotic Disorders, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Brain Science and Technology Research Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai Arch Psychiatry. 2016 Dec 25;28(6):301-308. doi: 10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.216121.
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasion brain stimulation, which has been suggested as a safe and promising treatment for auditory hallucinations, however, no systematic review has been conducted to evaluate the effects of tDCS on auditory hallucinations (AH).
To investigate the efficacy and safety of tDCS for auditory hallucinations among patients with schizophrenia.
We searched relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chongqing VIP database for Chinese Technical Periodicals, WANFANG DATA, Chinese Biological Medical Literature Database, and Taiwan Electronic Periodical Services (TEPS) before February 13, 2016. Studies were selected based on pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The quality of each included study was assessed by the risk of bias table. The levels of evidence of primary outcomes were evaluated using GRADE criteria. Data synthesis was conducted using RevMan 5.3.
304 papers were screened. Finally, three studies with a combined sample size of 87 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Two studies were classified as having 'low risk of bias', one study was classified as having 'unclear'. Inconsistent results and the overall level of evidence of primary outcome was graded as 'low'.
The sample sizes of the published studies were small and the results were inconsistent. We could not draw any strong conclusions from these trials. Further high quality RCTs with large sample sizes are needed to assess the efficacy of tDCS for auditory hallucinations in patients with schizophrenia.
经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)是一种非侵入性脑刺激,已被认为是治疗幻听的一种安全且有前景的方法,然而,尚未进行系统评价来评估tDCS对幻听(AH)的影响。
探讨tDCS对精神分裂症患者幻听的疗效和安全性。
我们检索了截至2016年2月13日的PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆、中国知网、维普中文科技期刊数据库、万方数据、中国生物医学文献数据库和台湾电子期刊服务(TEPS)中的相关随机对照试验(RCT)。根据预先定义的纳入和排除标准选择研究。通过偏倚风险表评估每项纳入研究的质量。使用GRADE标准评估主要结局的证据水平。使用RevMan 5.3进行数据合成。
筛选出304篇论文。最终,三项研究共87例患者被纳入荟萃分析。两项研究被归类为“低偏倚风险”,一项研究被归类为“不清楚”。结果不一致,主要结局的总体证据水平被评为“低”。
已发表研究的样本量较小且结果不一致。我们无法从这些试验中得出任何有力结论。需要进一步开展高质量、大样本量的RCT来评估tDCS对精神分裂症患者幻听的疗效。