Suppr超能文献

比较阿法替尼与吉非替尼或厄洛替尼对携带非经典表皮生长因子受体突变的晚期肺腺癌患者的疗效。

Comparing the effects of afatinib with gefitinib or Erlotinib in patients with advanced-stage lung adenocarcinoma harboring non-classical epidermal growth factor receptor mutations.

作者信息

Shen Yi-Cheng, Tseng Guan-Chin, Tu Chih-Yeh, Chen Wei-Chun, Liao Wei-Chih, Chen Wei-Cheng, Li Chia-Hsiang, Chen Hung-Jen, Hsia Te-Chun

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.

Department of Pathology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.

出版信息

Lung Cancer. 2017 Aug;110:56-62. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.06.007. Epub 2017 Jun 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Approximately 10%-15% patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations harbor non-classical mutations. However, the effects of EGFR-tyrosine kinases (TKIs), particularly second-generation EGFR-TKI (afatinib) compared to first-generation EGFR-TKIs (gefitinib/erlotinib), in patients with non-classical EGFR mutations remain unknown.

METHODS

We conducted this retrospective study at the China Medical University Hospital (Taichung, Taiwan) from June 2011 to July 2016. Specimens from 1632 patients were tested for EGFR mutations. We surveyed the effectiveness of afatinib and gefitinib/erlotinib in stage IIIb-IV lung adenocarcinoma patients with non-classical EGFR mutations.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients with advanced-stage (stage IIIB-IV) lung adenocarcinoma with non-classical mutations and receiving EGFR-TKI treatment had completed follow-up and were further analyzed. Afatinib versus gefitinib/erlotinib showed that the objective response rates were 62.5% versus 50.0% (p=0.35). Median progression-free survival (PFS) of 11.0 versus 3.6 months (p=0.03), respectively, was observed for the 51 non-classical EGFR mutated (excluding 5 patients with exon 20 insertions) lung adenocarcinomas. Subset analysis showed that PFS curves of afatinib were more easily distinguished in non-classical EGFR mutations lacking a combination with a classical mutation (non-classical with classical complex mutations group: median PFS, 11.0 versus 8.2 months, p=0.19; non-classical mutation alone or in combination with other non-classical mutations group: median PFS, 18.3 versus 2.8 months, p=0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

Afatinib may be a first-choice EGFR-TKI for patients with advanced-stage lung adenocarcinomas harboring non-classical mutations.

摘要

目的

约10%-15%表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变患者存在非经典突变。然而,EGFR酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs),尤其是第二代EGFR-TKI(阿法替尼)与第一代EGFR-TKIs(吉非替尼/厄洛替尼)相比,在非经典EGFR突变患者中的疗效仍不清楚。

方法

我们于2011年6月至2016年7月在中国医科大学附设医院(台湾台中)进行了这项回顾性研究。对1632例患者的标本进行了EGFR突变检测。我们调查了阿法替尼和吉非替尼/厄洛替尼在IIIb-IV期非经典EGFR突变肺腺癌患者中的疗效。

结果

56例晚期(IIIB-IV期)非经典突变且接受EGFR-TKI治疗的肺腺癌患者完成随访并进行进一步分析。阿法替尼与吉非替尼/厄洛替尼相比,客观缓解率分别为62.5%和50.0%(p=0.35)。对于51例非经典EGFR突变(不包括5例20号外显子插入患者)的肺腺癌,观察到的中位无进展生存期(PFS)分别为11.0个月和3.6个月(p=0.03)。亚组分析显示,在缺乏与经典突变联合的非经典EGFR突变中,阿法替尼的PFS曲线更容易区分(非经典与经典复合突变组:中位PFS,11.0个月对8.2个月,p=0.19;单独非经典突变或与其他非经典突变联合组:中位PFS,18.3个月对2.8个月,p=0.07)。

结论

对于存在非经典突变的晚期肺腺癌患者,阿法替尼可能是首选的EGFR-TKI。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验