Rivinius Rasmus, Helmschrott Matthias, Ruhparwar Arjang, Darche Fabrice F, Thomas Dierk, Bruckner Tom, Katus Hugo A, Doesch Andreas O
Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology.
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital.
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2017 Jun 19;11:1827-1837. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S136948. eCollection 2017.
Major concerns about the safety of pretransplant amiodarone use have been raised. As a result of its long half-life, the cardiac allograft is exposed to amiodarone posing potential risks such as bradycardia, requirement for pacemaker implantation, or increased mortality after heart transplantation (HTX).
The aim of this study is to investigate the posttransplant outcomes of patients with no, acute, or chronic amiodarone use before HTX.
This retrospective single-center study included 530 adult patients who received HTX between 06/1989 and 12/2012. Patients were stratified by their amiodarone therapy before HTX: no continuous amiodarone use (≤90 days before HTX), acute amiodarone use (≤90 days before HTX), and chronic amiodarone use (>90 days before HTX). Differences between the 3 groups in demographics, posttransplant medication, echocardiographic features, heart rates including occurrences of bradycardia, permanent pacemaker implantation, atrial fibrillation (AF), and survival were analyzed.
A total of 412 patients (77.7%) were in the "no amiodarone" group, 23 patients (4.4%) in the "acute amiodarone" group, and 95 patients (17.9%) in the "chronic amiodarone" group. Left ventricular ejection fraction (=0.5819), heart rates including occurrence of bradycardia during posttransplant week 1 (=0.0979 and =0.2695), week 2 (=0.1214 and =0.8644), week 3 (=0.1033 and =0.8894), and week 4 (=0.2892 and =0.8644), permanent pacemaker implantation within 30-day (=0.8644), or overall follow-up after HTX (=0.8664) were not significant between groups. Patients with chronic pretransplant amiodarone therapy had the lowest rate of early posttransplant AF (=0.0065). There was no statistically significant difference between groups in 30-day (=0.8656), 1-year (=1.0000), 2-year (=0.8763), 5-year (=0.5174), or overall posttransplant follow-up mortality (=0.1936).
Administration of acute or chronic pretransplant amiodarone was not related to an increased occurrence of bradycardia, requirement for permanent pacemaker implantation, or mortality after HTX. Importantly, chronic amiodarone use effectively reduced early AF after HTX, whereas acute amiodarone use showed no such effect.
移植前使用胺碘酮的安全性引发了重大关注。由于其半衰期长,心脏移植受者会接触到胺碘酮,这带来了潜在风险,如心动过缓、需要植入起搏器或心脏移植(HTX)后死亡率增加。
本研究旨在调查心脏移植前未使用、急性使用或慢性使用胺碘酮的患者移植后的结局。
这项回顾性单中心研究纳入了1989年6月至2012年12月期间接受心脏移植的530例成年患者。根据心脏移植前的胺碘酮治疗情况对患者进行分层:未持续使用胺碘酮(心脏移植前≤90天)、急性使用胺碘酮(心脏移植前≤90天)和慢性使用胺碘酮(心脏移植前>90天)。分析了三组在人口统计学、移植后用药、超声心动图特征、心率(包括心动过缓的发生率)、永久起搏器植入、心房颤动(AF)和生存率方面的差异。
共有412例患者(77.7%)在“未使用胺碘酮”组,23例患者(4.4%)在“急性使用胺碘酮”组,95例患者(17.9%)在“慢性使用胺碘酮”组。左心室射血分数(=0.5819),心率包括移植后第1周(=0.0979和=0.2695)、第2周(=0.1214和=0.8644)、第3周(=0.1033和=0.8894)和第4周(=0.2892和=0.8644)心动过缓的发生率,30天内永久起搏器植入率(=0.8644),或心脏移植后的总体随访率(=0.8664)在各组之间无显著差异。移植前接受慢性胺碘酮治疗的患者移植后早期房颤发生率最低(=0.0065)。各组在30天(=0.8656)、1年(=1.0000)、2年(=0.8763)、5年(=0.5174)或移植后总体随访死亡率(=0.1936)方面无统计学显著差异。
移植前急性或慢性使用胺碘酮与心脏移植后心动过缓发生率增加、永久起搏器植入需求或死亡率无关。重要的是,慢性使用胺碘酮有效降低了心脏移植后早期房颤发生率,而急性使用胺碘酮则无此效果。