Suppr超能文献

经皮肝穿刺活检术用于判定肝癌分级对于肝移植候选者的选择并不可靠。

Determination of hepatocellular carcinoma grade by needle biopsy is unreliable for liver transplant candidate selection.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.

Division of Surgical Oncology, Greater Los Angeles Veteran Affairs, Los Angeles, CA.

出版信息

Liver Transpl. 2017 Sep;23(9):1123-1132. doi: 10.1002/lt.24811.

Abstract

The objective of this article is to evaluate the utility of preoperative needle biopsy (PNB) grading of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) as a biomarker for liver transplantation (LT) candidate selection. Given the prognostic significance of HCC tumor grade, PNB grading has been proposed as a biomarker for LT candidate selection. Clinicopathologic characteristics of HCC LT recipients (1989-2014) with a PNB were analyzed, and the concordance of PNB grade to explant grade and vascular invasion was assessed to determine whether incorporation of PNB grade to accepted transplant criteria improved candidate selection. Of 965 patients undergoing LT for HCC, 234 (24%) underwent PNB at a median of 280 days prior to transplant. Grade by PNB had poor concordance to final explant pathology (κ = 0.22; P = 0.003), and low sensitivity (29%) and positive predictive value (35%) in identifying poorly differentiated tumors. Vascular invasion was predicted by explant pathologic grade (r 0.24; P < 0.001) but not PNB grade (r = -0.05; P = 0.50). Increasing explant pathology grade (P = 0.02), but not PNB grade (P = 0.65), discriminated post-LT HCC recurrence risk. The incorporation of PNB grade to the established radiologic Milan criteria (MC) did not result in improved prognostication of post-LT recurrence (net reclassification index [NRI] = 0%), whereas grade by explant pathology resulted in significantly improved reclassification of risk (NRI = 19%). Preoperative determination of HCC grade by PNB has low concordance with explant pathologic grade and low sensitivity and positive predictive value in identifying poorly differentiated tumors. PNB grade did not accurately discriminate post-LT HCC recurrence and had no utility in improving prognostication compared with the MC alone. Incorporation of PNB to guide transplant candidate selection appears unjustified. Liver Transplantation 23 1123-1132 2017 AASLD.

摘要

本文旨在评估术前肝肿瘤(HCC)细针穿刺活检(PNB)分级作为肝移植(LT)候选者选择的生物标志物的效用。鉴于 HCC 肿瘤分级的预后意义,PNB 分级已被提议作为 LT 候选者选择的生物标志物。分析了 1989 年至 2014 年间接受 HCC LT 并进行 PNB 的 HCC LT 受者的临床病理特征,并评估了 PNB 分级与活检分级和血管侵犯的一致性,以确定将 PNB 分级纳入可接受的移植标准是否改善了候选者选择。在 965 例接受 HCC LT 的患者中,有 234 例(24%)在移植前中位数为 280 天进行了 PNB。PNB 分级与最终活检病理分级一致性差(κ=0.22;P=0.003),在识别低分化肿瘤方面敏感性(29%)和阳性预测值(35%)低。血管侵犯可由活检病理分级预测(r=0.24;P<0.001),但不能由 PNB 分级预测(r=-0.05;P=0.50)。肝移植后 HCC 复发风险的差异取决于肝组织学分级的增加(P=0.02),而不是 PNB 分级(P=0.65)。将 PNB 分级纳入既定的影像学米兰标准(MC)并不能改善肝移植后复发的预后(净重新分类指数[NRI]=0%),而活检分级则显著改善了风险的重新分类(NRI=19%)。术前通过 PNB 测定 HCC 分级与活检病理分级一致性差,在识别低分化肿瘤方面敏感性和阳性预测值低。PNB 分级不能准确区分肝移植后 HCC 的复发,与 MC 相比,在预测预后方面没有作用。将 PNB 分级纳入指导移植候选者选择似乎没有依据。肝脏移植 23 1123-1132 2017 AASLD。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验