Meaume S, Dompmartin A, Lok C, Lazareth I, Sigal M, Truchetet F, Sauvadet A, Bohbot S
Dermatologist and Geriatrician, Head of Geriatric Department and Wound Care Unit, Rothschild University Hospital, Paris, France.
Dermatologist, Dermatology Department, Clemenceau University Hospital, Caen, France.
J Wound Care. 2017 Jul 2;26(7):368-379. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2017.26.7.368.
We recently showed the superiority of a matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) modulating dressing (foam impregnated with NOSF, nano-oligosaccharide factor) compared with a lipidocolloid matrix (TLC) control dressing in median wound area reduction (WAR). Here we report the results from the same study assessing the performance and safety of TLC-NOSF in the local management of venous leg ulcers (VLUs) or mixed leg ulcers and determining its impact on the patient's health-related quality of life (HRQoL).
A superiority randomised double-blind controlled trial was conducted on patients presenting with a non-infected leg ulcer (VLUs or mixed leg ulcers) of predominantly venous origin (ABPI >0.8), with a surface area ranging from 5 to 50cm and a duration of 6 to 36 months. Patients were randomly allocated to either the TLC-NOSF matrix foam (UrgoStart) dressing group or to the neutral TLC foam dressing group (UrgoTul Absorb). All received appropriate compression therapy and the wounds were assessed blindly (clinical examination, wound area tracing and photographic record) every 2 weeks for a period of 8 weeks, or until complete closure. A secondary endpoint, described here, was the patient's HRQoL, documented by the patient, through the EuroQol 5D tool (EQ-5D) questionnaire and visual analogue scale (VAS).
In total, 187 patients were randomised to either the TLC-NOSF group (n=94) or the control dressing group (n=93). The two groups were well balanced at baseline with regard to wound and patient characteristics. In the HRQoL questionnaire (EQ-5D), the pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression dimensions were significantly improved in the TLC-NOSF group versus the control one (pain/discomfort: 1.53±0.53 versus 1.74±0.65; p=0.022, and anxiety/depression: 1.35±0.53 versus 1.54±0.60, p=0.037). The VAS score was better in the test group compared with the control group (72.1±17.5 versus 67.3±18.7, respectively), without reaching significance (p=0.072). Acceptability and tolerance of the two products were similar in both groups.
The double-blind clinical trial has demonstrated that the TLC-NOSF matrix dressing promotes faster healing of VLUs and mixed leg ulcers and significantly reduces the pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression experienced by the patients. These results suggest that acceleration of VLU healing could improve the HRQoL of the patients and reduced the emotional and social burden of these chronic wounds.
我们最近发现,与脂质胶体基质(TLC)对照敷料相比,基质金属蛋白酶(MMP)调节敷料(含纳米低聚糖因子NOSF的泡沫敷料)在减少伤口中位面积(WAR)方面具有优越性。在此,我们报告同一研究的结果,该研究评估了TLC-NOSF在下肢静脉溃疡(VLU)或混合性腿部溃疡局部治疗中的性能和安全性,并确定其对患者健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)的影响。
对主要因静脉原因导致的非感染性腿部溃疡(VLU或混合性腿部溃疡)患者(踝肱指数>0.8)进行了一项优越性随机双盲对照试验,溃疡表面积为5至50平方厘米,病程为6至36个月。患者被随机分配到TLC-NOSF基质泡沫(UrgoStart)敷料组或中性TLC泡沫敷料组(UrgoTul Absorb)。所有患者均接受适当的加压治疗,每2周对伤口进行一次盲法评估(临床检查、伤口面积追踪和拍照记录),为期8周,或直至完全愈合。这里描述的一个次要终点是患者的HRQoL,由患者通过欧洲五维健康量表(EQ-5D)问卷和视觉模拟量表(VAS)记录。
共有187例患者被随机分配到TLC-NOSF组(n=94)或对照敷料组(n=93)。两组在伤口和患者特征方面基线时平衡良好。在HRQoL问卷(EQ-5D)中,与对照组相比,TLC-NOSF组的疼痛/不适和焦虑/抑郁维度有显著改善(疼痛/不适:1.53±0.53对1.74±0.65;p=0.022,焦虑/抑郁:1.35±0.53对1.54±0.60,p=0.037)。试验组的VAS评分优于对照组(分别为72.1±17.5和67.3±18.7),但未达到显著差异(p=0.072)。两组中两种产品的可接受性和耐受性相似。
双盲临床试验表明,TLC-NOSF基质敷料可促进VLU和混合性腿部溃疡更快愈合,并显著减轻患者的疼痛/不适和焦虑/抑郁。这些结果表明,加速VLU愈合可改善患者的HRQoL,并减轻这些慢性伤口的情感和社会负担。