Rutman Aaron M, Rapp Elliot J, Hippe Daniel S, Vu Baoanh, Mossa-Basha Mahmud
From the Departments of *Radiology, and †Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2017 Nov/Dec;41(6):877-883. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000635.
This study differentiates cerebral fat embolism (CFE) and diffuse axonal injury (DAI) on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) and T2*-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.
Consecutive CFE and DAI cases were retrospectively selected. Hemorrhages were characterized by number, size/shape, and distribution, whereas DWI lesions by pattern. The number of hemorrhages was compared using the Mann-Whitney test with adjustment for multiple comparisons, whereas DWI abnormality was compared using Fisher exact test.
Seven CFE and 20 DAI patients were included. Cerebral fat embolism had significantly more hemorrhages than DAI (mean, 670 ± 407 vs 136 ± 87; P = 0.01), particularly in the frontal (P = 0.025), parietal (P = 0.002), and occipital lobes (P = 0.01), the corpus callosum (P = 0.01), and cerebellum (P = 0.01). Cerebral fat embolism microhemorrhages were punctate/round, whereas DAI hemorrhages were small/medium sized (P < 0.001) and linear (P = 0.001). On DWI, DAI typically had few scattered abnormalities, whereas CFE had confluent abnormalities (P < 0.05).
Magnetic resonance imaging can differentiate CFE from DAI. Cerebral fat embolism demonstrates more hemorrhages. Larger or linear hemorrhages favor DAI. Diffuse confluent diffusion restriction favors CFE, whereas few scattered foci favor DAI.
本研究在扩散加权磁共振成像(DWI)和T2*加权磁共振成像上鉴别脑脂肪栓塞(CFE)和弥漫性轴索损伤(DAI)。
回顾性选取连续的CFE和DAI病例。出血根据数量、大小/形状和分布进行特征描述,而DWI病变根据模式进行描述。使用Mann-Whitney检验并对多重比较进行校正来比较出血数量,使用Fisher精确检验比较DWI异常情况。
纳入7例CFE患者和20例DAI患者。脑脂肪栓塞的出血明显多于DAI(平均,670±407对136±87;P=0.01),特别是在额叶(P=0.025)、顶叶(P=0.002)、枕叶(P=0.01)、胼胝体(P=0.01)和小脑(P=0.01)。脑脂肪栓塞的微出血为点状/圆形,而DAI的出血为小/中等大小(P<0.001)且呈线性(P=0.001)。在DWI上,DAI通常有少量散在异常,而CFE有融合性异常(P<0.05)。
磁共振成像可区分CFE和DAI。脑脂肪栓塞显示出更多出血。较大或线性出血提示DAI。弥漫性融合性扩散受限提示CFE,而少量散在病灶提示DAI。