Chintalacheruvu Vamsi Krishna, Balraj Rajasekaran Uttukuli, Putchala Lavanya Sireesha, Pachalla Sreelekha
Department of Prosthodontics, Care Dental College, Guntur, Andra Pradesh, India.
Department of Orthodontics, Sibar Institute of Dental Sciences, Guntur, Andra Pradesh, India.
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2017 Jun;7(Suppl 1):S18-S23. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_102_17. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
The objective of the present study is to compare the effectiveness of three different processing techniques and to find out the accuracy of processing techniques through number of occlusal interferences and increase in vertical dimension after denture processing.
A cross-sectional study was conducted on a sample of 18 patients indicated for complete denture fabrication was selected for the study and they were divided into three subgroups. Three processing techniques, compression molding and injection molding using prepolymerized resin and unpolymerized resin, were used to fabricate dentures for each of the groups. After processing, laboratory-remounted dentures were evaluated for number of occlusal interferences in centric and eccentric relations and change in vertical dimension through vertical pin rise in articulator. Data were analyzed using statistical test ANOVA and SPSS software version 19.0 by IBM was used.
Data obtained from three groups were subjected to one-way ANOVA test. After ANOVA test, results with significant variations were subjected to test. Number of occlusal interferences with compression molding technique was reported to be more in both centric and eccentric positions as compared to the two injection molding techniques with statistical significance in centric, protrusive, right lateral nonworking, and left lateral working positions ( < 0.05). Mean vertical pin rise (0.52 mm) was reported to more in compression molding technique as compared to injection molding techniques, which is statistically significant ( < 0.001).
Within the limitations of this study, injection molding techniques exhibited less processing errors as compared to compression molding technique with statistical significance. There was no statistically significant difference in processing errors reported within two injection molding systems.
本研究的目的是比较三种不同加工技术的有效性,并通过义齿加工后咬合干扰的数量和垂直距离的增加来确定加工技术的准确性。
对18例适合制作全口义齿的患者样本进行横断面研究,将他们分为三个亚组。使用三种加工技术,即使用预聚合树脂和未聚合树脂的压缩成型和注射成型,为每个组制作义齿。加工后,对实验室重新安装的义齿进行评估,以确定正中关系和非正中关系中的咬合干扰数量,并通过咬合架上的垂直针上升来评估垂直距离的变化。使用统计检验方差分析,并使用IBM的SPSS软件版本19.0对数据进行分析。
对三组获得的数据进行单因素方差分析。方差分析后,对有显著差异的结果进行检验。与两种注射成型技术相比,压缩成型技术在正中位置和非正中位置的咬合干扰数量均更多,在正中、前伸、右侧非工作侧和左侧工作侧位置具有统计学意义(<0.05)。据报道,压缩成型技术的平均垂直针上升(0.52mm)比注射成型技术更多,具有统计学意义(<0.001)。
在本研究的局限性内,与压缩成型技术相比,注射成型技术表现出较少的加工误差,具有统计学意义。两种注射成型系统报告的加工误差没有统计学显著差异。