Goetschius John, Feger Mark A, Hertel Jay, Hart Joseph M
J Sport Rehabil. 2018 Jan 1;27(1). doi: 10.1123/jsr.2017-0152. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
Measurements of center-of-pressure (COP) excursions during balance are common practice in clinical and research settings to evaluate adaptations in postural control due to pathological or environmental conditions. Traditionally measured using laboratory force plates, pressure-mat devices may be a suitable option for clinicians and scientist to measure COP excursions.
Compare COP measures and changes during balance between MatScan® pressure mat and force plate.
Validation study.
Laboratory.
30 healthy, young adults (19 female, 11 male, 22.7 ± 3.4 y, 70.3 ± SD kg, 1.71 ± 0.09 m).
COP excursions were simultaneously measured using pressure-mat and force-plate devices. Participants completed 3 eyes-open and 3 eyes-closed single-leg balance trials (10 s). Mean of the 3 trials was used to calculate 4 COP variables: medial-lateral and anterior-posterior excursion, total distance, and area with eyes open and eyes closed. Percent change and effect sizes were calculated between eyes-open to eyes-closed conditions for each variable and for both devices.
All COP variables were highly correlated between devices for eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions (all r > .92, P < .001). Bland-Altman plots suggest the pressure-mat COP measurements were smaller than those of the force-plate, and the differences between devices appeared to increase as the measurement magnitude increased. Percent change in COP variables was highly correlated between devices (r > .85, P < .001). Cohen d effect sizes between eyes-open and eyes-closed were all large (d > 2.25) and similar in magnitude between devices.
COP measures were correlated between devices, but values tended to be smaller using the pressure mat. The pressure mat and force plate detected comparable magnitude changes in COP measurements between eyes-open and eyes-closed. Pressure mats may provide a viable option for detecting large magnitude changes in postural control during short-duration testing.
在临床和研究环境中,测量平衡过程中的压力中心(COP)偏移是一种常见做法,用于评估由于病理或环境条件导致的姿势控制适应性变化。传统上使用实验室测力台进行测量,压力垫设备可能是临床医生和科学家测量COP偏移的合适选择。
比较MatScan®压力垫和测力台在平衡过程中的COP测量值及变化情况。
验证研究。
实验室。
30名健康的年轻成年人(19名女性,11名男性,年龄22.7±3.4岁,体重70.3±标准差kg,身高1.71±0.09米)。
使用压力垫和测力台设备同时测量COP偏移。参与者完成3次睁眼和3次闭眼单腿平衡试验(10秒)。使用3次试验的平均值计算4个COP变量:内外侧和前后偏移、总距离以及睁眼和闭眼时的面积。计算每个变量以及两种设备在睁眼到闭眼条件下的百分比变化和效应大小。
在睁眼和闭眼条件下,两种设备的所有COP变量均高度相关(所有r>.92,P<.001)。Bland-Altman图表明,压力垫的COP测量值小于测力台的测量值,且随着测量幅度的增加,两种设备之间的差异似乎也在增加。两种设备的COP变量百分比变化高度相关(r>.85,P<.001)。睁眼和闭眼之间的Cohen d效应大小均较大(d>2.25),且两种设备的效应大小在幅度上相似。
两种设备的COP测量值具有相关性,但使用压力垫时数值往往较小。压力垫和测力台在睁眼和闭眼的COP测量中检测到的变化幅度相当。在短时间测试中,压力垫可能是检测姿势控制中大幅度变化的可行选择。