López Pío, Arguedas Mohs Adriano, Abdelnour Vásquez Arturo, Consuelo-Miranda Maria, Feroldi Emmanuel, Noriega Fernando, Jordanov Emilia, B Chir Siham, Zambrano Betzana
From the *Centro de Estudios en Infectología Pediátrica, Cali, Colombia; †Instituto de Atención Pediátrica, San José de Costa Rica, Costa Rica; ‡Centro Investigaciones Epidemilógicas, Facultad de Salud, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia; §Clinical Sciences, Sanofi Pasteur, Marcy L'Etoile, France; ¶Clinical Sciences, Sanofi Pasteur, Swiftwater, Pennsylvania; ‖Clinical Programs, Sanofi Pasteur, Marcy L'Etoile, France; and **Clinical Sciences, Sanofi Pasteur, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2017 Nov;36(11):e272-e282. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000001682.
Hexavalent diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-inactivated poliovirus-hepatitis B-Haemophilus influenzae type b (DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP-T)-containing vaccines are increasingly the standard of care. This study evaluated the primary series (NCT01177722) and booster (NCT01444781) of a fully liquid DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP-T vaccine in Latin America.
Infants (N = 1375) received hepatitis B vaccine at birth and were randomized to one of 3 batches of the investigational DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP-T or licensed control vaccine (DTaP-HB-IPV//PRP-T) at 2-4 to 6 months of age, coadministered with 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) (2-4-6 months) and rotavirus vaccine (2-4 months). A booster of either DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP-T or control was given at 12-24 months, coadministered with PCV7. Immunogenicity was assessed by validated assays and safety from parental reports.
Primary series seroprotection and vaccine response rates were equivalent for DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP-T batches. For pooled batches, noninferiority to the control vaccine was demonstrated for each antigen. There were no descriptive differences in antibody persistence or booster response between DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP-T and the control. The booster responses to either vaccine following DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP-T primary series or to DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP-T following a control vaccine primary series were similar. The anti-aP component (filamentous hemagglutinin [FHA] and pertussis toxin [PT]) vaccine response and anti-Haemophilus influenzae type b (PRP) series seroprotection (≥0.15 µg/mL) rates were ≥73.0% after 2 primary series doses. Antipyretics had no effect on the immune response, and an extra (oral) polio vaccination had no effect on the antipolio booster response. Responses to PCV7 and rotavirus vaccine were similar for each coadministration. There were no safety concerns observed with any vaccine.
These results confirm the suitability of the fully liquid DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP-T vaccine for primary and booster vaccination of infants.
含六价白喉-破伤风-无细胞百日咳-灭活脊髓灰质炎病毒-乙型肝炎- b型流感嗜血杆菌(DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP-T)疫苗日益成为标准治疗方案。本研究评估了一种全液体DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP-T疫苗在拉丁美洲的基础免疫系列(NCT01177722)和加强免疫(NCT01444781)情况。
婴儿(N = 1375)在出生时接种乙型肝炎疫苗,并在2至4月龄至6月龄时随机分为3批研究用DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP-T疫苗或已获许可的对照疫苗(DTaP-HB-IPV//PRP-T)中的一组,同时与7价肺炎球菌结合疫苗(PCV7)(2至4至6月龄)和轮状病毒疫苗(2至4月龄)联合接种。在12至24月龄时给予DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP-T或对照疫苗加强免疫,同时与PCV7联合接种。通过验证的检测方法评估免疫原性,并根据家长报告评估安全性。
DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP-T各批次基础免疫系列的血清保护率和疫苗应答率相当。对于合并批次,每种抗原均证明不劣于对照疫苗。DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP-T与对照疫苗在抗体持久性或加强免疫应答方面无描述性差异。DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP-T基础免疫系列后对任何一种疫苗的加强免疫应答,或对照疫苗基础免疫系列后对DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP-T的加强免疫应答相似。2剂基础免疫系列后,抗无细胞百日咳成分(丝状血凝素[FHA]和百日咳毒素[PT])疫苗应答率和抗b型流感嗜血杆菌(PRP)系列血清保护率(≥0.15 µg/mL)≥73.0%。退烧药对免疫应答无影响,额外(口服)接种脊髓灰质炎疫苗对脊髓灰质炎加强免疫应答无影响。每次联合接种时,对PCV7和轮状病毒疫苗的应答相似。未观察到任何疫苗存在安全问题。
这些结果证实了全液体DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP-T疫苗用于婴儿基础免疫和加强免疫的适用性。