Holt Kelsey, Janiak Elizabeth, McCormick Marie C, Lieberman Ellice, Dehlendorf Christine, Kajeepeta Sandhya, Caglia Jacquelyn M, Langer Ana
Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health.
Fam Med. 2017 Jul;49(7):527-536.
Primary care physicians (PCPs) can play a critical role in addressing unintended pregnancy through high-quality options counseling and referrals.
We surveyed a nationally representative sample of 3,000 PCPs in general, family, and internal medicine on practices and opinions related to options counseling for unintended pregnancy. We assessed predictors of physician practices using multivariable logistic regression weighted for sampling design and differential non-response.
Response rate was 29%. Seventy-one percent believed residency training in options counseling should be required, and 69% believed PCPs have an obligation to provide abortion referrals even in the presence of a personal objection to abortion. However, only 26% reported routine options counseling when caring for women with unintended pregnancy compared to 60% who routinely discuss prenatal care. Among physicians who see women seeking abortion, 62% routinely provide referrals, while 14% routinely attempt to dissuade women. Family physicians were more likely to provide routine options counseling when seeing patients with unintended pregnancy than internal medicine physicians (32% vs 21%, P=0.002). In multivariable analyses, factors associated with higher odds of routine abortion referrals were more years in practice (OR=1.03 for each additional year, 95% CI: 1.00-1.05), identifying as a woman vs a man (OR=2.11, 95% CI: 1.31-3.40), practicing in a hospital vs private primary care/multispecialty setting (OR=3.17, 95% CI: 1.10-9.15), and no religious affiliation of practice vs religious affiliation (OR for Catholic affiliation=0.27, 95% CI: 0.11-0.66; OR for other religious affiliation=0.36, 95% CI: 0.15-0.83). Personal Christian religious affiliation among physicians who regularly attend religious services vs no religious affiliation was associated with lower odds of counseling (OR=0.48, 95% CI: 0.26-0.90) and referrals (OR=0.31, 95% CI: 0.15-0.62), and higher odds of abortion dissuasion (OR=4.03, 95% CI: 1.46-11.14).
Findings reveal the need to support fuller integration of options counseling and abortion referrals in primary care, particularly through institutional and professional society guidelines and training opportunities to impart skills and highlight the professional obligation to provide non-directive information and support to women with unintended pregnancy.
基层医疗医生(PCP)可通过高质量的选择咨询和转诊,在解决意外怀孕问题中发挥关键作用。
我们对3000名从事普通内科、家庭医学和内科的具有全国代表性的基层医疗医生样本进行了调查,了解他们在意外怀孕选择咨询方面的做法和观点。我们使用针对抽样设计和不同无应答情况加权的多变量逻辑回归评估医生做法的预测因素。
应答率为29%。71%的人认为应要求住院医师接受选择咨询培训,69%的人认为即使基层医疗医生个人反对堕胎,也有义务提供堕胎转诊。然而,在照顾意外怀孕女性时,只有26%的人报告进行常规选择咨询,相比之下,60%的人会常规讨论产前护理。在接待寻求堕胎的女性的医生中,62%的人常规提供转诊,而14%的人常规试图劝阻女性。与内科医生相比,家庭医生在接待意外怀孕患者时更有可能提供常规选择咨询(32%对21%,P = 0.002)。在多变量分析中,与常规堕胎转诊几率较高相关的因素包括执业年限更长(每增加一年,OR = 1.03,95%CI:1.00 - 1.05)、女性身份与男性身份相比(OR = 2.11,95%CI:1.31 - 3.40)、在医院执业与在私人基层医疗/多专科机构执业相比(OR = 3.17,95%CI:1.10 - 9.15),以及无宗教信仰与有宗教信仰相比(天主教信仰的OR = 0.27,95%CI:0.11 - 0.66;其他宗教信仰的OR = 0.36,95%CI:0.15 - 0.83)。经常参加宗教活动的医生与无宗教信仰的医生相比,个人基督教宗教信仰与咨询几率较低(OR = 0.48,95%CI:0.26 - 0.90)和转诊几率较低(OR = 0.31,95%CI:0.15 - 0.62)相关,且劝阻堕胎的几率较高(OR = 4.03,95%CI:1.46 - 11.14)。
研究结果表明,需要支持在基层医疗中更全面地整合选择咨询和堕胎转诊,特别是通过机构和专业协会的指导方针以及培训机会,以传授技能并强调向意外怀孕女性提供非指导性信息和支持的专业义务。