Thomas Jeffrey E, Rose Jack C
Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Washington Hospital and Washington Township Medical Foundation, Fremont, California, USA.
Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Washington Hospital and Washington Township Medical Foundation, Fremont, California, USA.
World Neurosurg. 2017 Oct;106:1054.e1-1054.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.07.032. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
Endovascular coil embolization and craniotomy with clip ligation are the 2 most commonly used treatments for ruptured cerebral aneurysm. Although coiling maintains the advantages of brevity and complete avoidance of brain retraction and manipulation, clipping offers the benefits of decompression of the injured brain and lower rates of aneurysm recurrence. A combined, immediately sequential treatment strategy for acutely ruptured cerebral aneurysm that simultaneously maximizes the advantages of both techniques, while minimizing their respective disadvantages, may be a useful paradigm.
To demonstrate the complementarity of clipping and coiling in acutely ruptured cerebral aneurysm.
Patients with ruptured anterior circulation cerebral aneurysm standing to benefit from brain decompression were treated by a combination of coiling and microneurosurgery in rapid succession, under the same general anesthetic. Surgery consisted of clipping of the aneurysm via either craniotomy or craniectomy with expansion duraplasty in all cases, and ventriculostomy in selected cases.
Coil embolization of the ruptured aneurysm was carried out rapidly and improved the efficiency of subsequent clipping by allowing early unequivocal identification of the aneurysm dome and decreased brain retraction, reducing risk of intraoperative rupture and obviating temporary occlusion. All aneurysms were shown eliminated by postoperative cerebral angiography.
A deliberate combined treatment strategy that uses clipping immediately preceded by subtotal coiling under a single anesthetic may be ideal for selected ruptured cerebral aneurysms, takes advantage of the unique strengths of both techniques, makes both techniques easier, and maximizes opportunity for brain protection against delayed complications in the prolonged aftermath of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.
血管内弹簧圈栓塞术和开颅夹闭术是破裂性脑动脉瘤最常用的两种治疗方法。尽管弹簧圈栓塞术具有操作简便、完全避免脑牵拉和操作的优点,但夹闭术具有减轻受伤脑组织压力和降低动脉瘤复发率的优势。对于急性破裂性脑动脉瘤,一种联合的、立即序贯的治疗策略,可同时最大限度地发挥两种技术的优势,同时最小化其各自的缺点,可能是一种有用的模式。
证明夹闭术和弹簧圈栓塞术在急性破裂性脑动脉瘤中的互补性。
对于有望从脑减压中获益的前循环破裂性脑动脉瘤患者,在相同的全身麻醉下,迅速连续进行弹簧圈栓塞术和显微神经外科手术联合治疗。手术包括在所有病例中通过开颅术或颅骨切除术加硬脑膜扩大修补术夹闭动脉瘤,在部分病例中进行脑室造瘘术。
迅速对破裂的动脉瘤进行弹簧圈栓塞,通过早期明确识别动脉瘤瘤顶提高了后续夹闭术的效率,减少了脑牵拉,降低了术中破裂的风险,避免了临时阻断。术后脑血管造影显示所有动脉瘤均被消除。
对于选定的破裂性脑动脉瘤,在单一麻醉下先进行部分弹簧圈栓塞然后立即进行夹闭的精心设计的联合治疗策略可能是理想的,利用了两种技术的独特优势,使两种技术操作更简便,并最大限度地为脑提供保护,防止动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血长期后遗症中的延迟并发症。