Centre for Contact Lens Research, School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
Department of Optometry and Vision Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Ocul Surf. 2017 Jul;15(3):575-628. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
The members of the Management and Therapy Subcommittee undertook an evidence-based review of current dry eye therapies and management options. Management options reviewed in detail included treatments for tear insufficiency and lid abnormalities, as well as anti-inflammatory medications, surgical approaches, dietary modifications, environmental considerations and complementary therapies. Following this extensive review it became clear that many of the treatments available for the management of dry eye disease lack the necessary Level 1 evidence to support their recommendation, often due to a lack of appropriate masking, randomization or controls and in some cases due to issues with selection bias or inadequate sample size. Reflecting on all available evidence, a staged management algorithm was derived that presents a step-wise approach to implementing the various management and therapeutic options according to disease severity. While this exercise indicated that differentiating between aqueous-deficient and evaporative dry eye disease was critical in selecting the most appropriate management strategy, it also highlighted challenges, based on the limited evidence currently available, in predicting relative benefits of specific management options, in managing the two dry eye disease subtypes. Further evidence is required to support the introduction, and continued use, of many of the treatment options currently available to manage dry eye disease, as well as to inform appropriate treatment starting points and understand treatment specificity in relation to dry eye disease subtype.
管理和治疗小组委员会的成员对当前干眼症的治疗方法和管理选择进行了基于证据的审查。详细审查的管理选项包括针对泪液不足和眼睑异常的治疗,以及抗炎药物、手术方法、饮食调整、环境考虑因素和补充疗法。经过广泛审查,很明显,许多可用于干眼症管理的治疗方法缺乏支持其推荐的必要一级证据,这通常是由于缺乏适当的掩蔽、随机化或对照,在某些情况下是由于选择偏倚或样本量不足的问题。考虑到所有可用的证据,得出了一个分级管理算法,根据疾病严重程度逐步提出实施各种管理和治疗选择的方法。虽然这一研究表明,区分水性缺乏性和蒸发性干眼症对于选择最合适的管理策略至关重要,但根据目前有限的证据,也突显了在预测特定管理选择的相对益处、管理两种干眼症亚型方面存在的挑战。需要进一步的证据来支持目前许多可用于管理干眼症的治疗选择的引入和持续使用,并为了解与干眼症亚型相关的治疗特异性和适当的治疗起点提供信息。