Creuziger A, Iadicola M A, Foecke T, Rust E, Banerjee D
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Materials Science and Engineering Division, 100 Bureau Dr., Gaithersburg, MD USA 20899.8553.
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Materials Science and Engineering Division, 100 Bureau Dr., Gaithersburg, MD USA 20899.8553.
JOM (1989). 2017 May;69(5):902-906. doi: 10.1007/s11837-017-2261-6. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
Four different cruciform sample designs, based on the work of Abu-Farha et al., were studied in this paper. Key features of this design are a recessed pocket with fillet and re-entrant corners. These samples were shown via digital image correlation to achieve widely differing strain values inside and outside the pocket. From the results of these tests, there are two competing failure mechanisms in the sample. The pocket region is affected by stress concentrations caused by the fillet, and re-entrant notches lead to strain limited constraints similar to diffuse and localized necks in uniaxial samples. Balancing these two constraints determines the success or premature failure of the sample.
本文研究了基于阿布 - 法尔哈等人的工作的四种不同的十字形样本设计。该设计的关键特征是带有圆角和凹角的凹槽。通过数字图像相关技术显示,这些样本在凹槽内外实现了差异很大的应变值。从这些测试结果来看,样本中存在两种相互竞争的失效机制。凹槽区域受到圆角引起的应力集中的影响,而凹口会导致类似于单轴样本中扩散和局部颈缩的应变受限约束。平衡这两种约束决定了样本的成功或过早失效。