Suppr超能文献

围手术期输注氨基酸预防全身麻醉手术期间体温过低并改善临床结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Perioperative Amino Acid Infusion for Preventing Hypothermia and Improving Clinical Outcomes During Surgery Under General Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

作者信息

Aoki Yoshitaka, Aoshima Yukie, Atsumi Kazuyuki, Kaminaka Ryo, Nakau Rintaro, Yanagida Kyoko, Kora Makiko, Fujii Shunsuke, Yokoyama Junichiro

机构信息

From the Department of Anesthesiology, Shizuoka General Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 2017 Sep;125(3):793-802. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002278.

Abstract

Amino acid (AA) infusion is sometimes selected to avoid hypothermia during general anesthesia. However, the widespread clinical use of AA infusion therapy has not been established. This study aimed to clarify the evidence that AA infusion can increase patient body temperature and improve clinical outcomes using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. We searched MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Igaku Chuo Zasshi (Japana Centra Revuo Medicina) in November 2015. Studies were reviewed by 2 independent assessors to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving AA infusion compared with placebos during surgery under general or combined general/epidural anesthesia. Study quality was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system and the Cochrane methodology. The primary outcome was difference in body temperature before and after perioperative AA infusion. Shivering frequency, blood loss volume, postoperative intubation time, and hospitalization period were also assessed as clinical outcomes. We analyzed the outcome data using a random effect model. From 298 screened titles, 14 RCTs met our inclusion criteria, including 626 patients (327 in AA and 299 in placebo groups). In 626 participants from 14 RCTs, AA infusion increased body temperature by a mean difference (MD) of 0.46°C (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31-0.62, low-quality evidence). Regarding other outcomes, AA infusion decreased shivering frequency by a risk ratio of 0.34 (95% CI, 0.12-0.94; 7 RCTs, 248 participants, very low-quality evidence), shortened postoperative intubation time by MD of -125 minutes (95% CI, -210 to -38.8; 2 RCTs, 158 participants, moderate-quality evidence), and shortened the hospitalization period by MD of -1.81 days (95% CI, -2.07 to -1.55; 3 RCTs, 230 participants, low-quality evidence) compared with placebo. There was no significant difference in the volume of blood loss between the 2 groups (standardized MD, -0.20, 95% CI, -0.44 to 0.04; low-quality evidence). There was no publication bias. AA infusion in the perioperative period increased patient body temperature and improved clinical outcomes compared with placebo. However, the evidence to support the use of AA infusion is limited, and further large-scale RCTs are required.

摘要

有时会选择输注氨基酸(AA)以避免全身麻醉期间体温过低。然而,AA输注疗法在临床上的广泛应用尚未确立。本研究旨在使用推荐分级评估、制定与评价系统(GRADE)阐明AA输注可提高患者体温并改善临床结局的证据。我们于2015年11月检索了MEDLINE(PubMed)、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库和《医学中央杂志》(日本医学中央杂志)。由2名独立评估员对研究进行审查,以确定在全身麻醉或全身/硬膜外联合麻醉下手术期间涉及AA输注与安慰剂比较的随机对照试验(RCT)。使用GRADE系统和Cochrane方法评估研究质量。主要结局是围手术期AA输注前后的体温差异。还评估了寒战频率、失血量、术后插管时间和住院时间等临床结局。我们使用随机效应模型分析结局数据。从298篇筛选标题中,14项RCT符合我们的纳入标准,包括626例患者(AA组327例,安慰剂组299例)。在14项RCT的626名参与者中,AA输注使体温平均升高0.46°C(95%置信区间[CI],0.31 - 0.62,低质量证据)。关于其他结局,与安慰剂相比,AA输注使寒战频率降低,风险比为0.34(95%CI,0.12 - 0.94;7项RCT,248名参与者,极低质量证据),术后插管时间缩短,平均差值为 - 125分钟(95%CI, - 210至 - 38.8;2项RCT,158名参与者,中等质量证据),住院时间缩短,平均差值为 - 1.81天(95%CI, - 2.07至 - 1.55;3项RCT,230名参与者,低质量证据)。两组间失血量无显著差异(标准化平均差值, - 0.20,95%CI, - 0.44至0.04;低质量证据)。不存在发表偏倚。与安慰剂相比,围手术期输注AA可提高患者体温并改善临床结局。然而,支持使用AA输注的证据有限,需要进一步进行大规模RCT。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验