Emmanouil Beatrice, Goldacre Michael J, Lambert Trevor W
UK Medical Careers Research Group, Unit of Health-Care Epidemiology, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Unit of Health-Care Epidemiology, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
BMC Anesthesiol. 2017 Jul 25;17(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12871-017-0392-5.
It is important to inform medical educators and workforce planners in Anaesthesia about early career choices for the specialty, factors that influence them and to elucidate how recent choices of men and women doctors relate to the overall historical trends in the specialty's popularity.
We analysed longitudinal data on career choice, based on self-completed questionnaires, from national year-of-qualification cohorts of UK-trained doctors from 1974 to 2012 surveyed one, three and 5 years post-qualification. Career destination data 10 years post-qualification were used for qualifiers between 1993 and 2002, to investigate the association between early choice and later destinations.
In years 1, 3 and 5 post-qualification, respectively, 59.9% (37,385), 64.6% (31,473), and 67.2% (24,971) of contactable doctors responded. There was an overall increase, from the early to the later cohorts, in the percentage of medical graduates who wished to enter anaesthesia: for instance year 1 choices rose from 4.6 to 9.4%, comparing the 1974 and 2012 cohorts. Men were more likely than women to express an early preference for a career in anaesthesia: for example, at year 3 after qualification anaesthesia was the choice of 10.1% of men and 7.9% of women. There was a striking increase in the certainty with which women chose anaesthesia as their future career specialty in recent compared to earlier cohorts, not reflected in any trends observed in men choosing anaesthesia. Sixty percent of doctors who were anaesthetists, 10 years after qualifying, had specified anaesthesia as their preferred specialty when surveyed in year 1, 80% in year 3, and 92% in year 5. Doctors working as anaesthetists were less likely than those working in other hospital specialties to have specified, as strong influences on specialty choice, 'experience of the subject' as students, 'inclinations before medical school', and 'what I really want to do'. Men anaesthetists were more influenced in their specialty choice than men in other hospital specialties by 'wanting a career with acceptable hours'; the corresponding difference among women was not significant.
We suggest a focus on inspirational teaching of anaesthesia in medical school and on greater exposure to the specialty in the foundation programme. Factors which may discourage women from entering anaesthesia should be explored and addressed.
让麻醉领域的医学教育工作者和劳动力规划者了解该专业的早期职业选择、影响这些选择的因素,并阐明近期男女医生的选择与该专业受欢迎程度的总体历史趋势之间的关系,这很重要。
我们分析了基于自填问卷的职业选择纵向数据,这些数据来自1974年至2012年在英国接受培训的医生的全国资格年份队列,在资格获得后的1年、3年和5年进行了调查。对于1993年至2002年期间的合格者,使用资格获得后10年的职业去向数据来研究早期选择与后期去向之间的关联。
在资格获得后的第1年、第3年和第5年,分别有59.9%(37,385人)、64.6%(31,473人)和67.2%(24,971人)可联系到的医生做出了回应。从早期队列到后期队列,希望进入麻醉专业的医学毕业生比例总体呈上升趋势:例如,将1974年和2012年的队列进行比较,第1年的选择比例从4.6%上升到了9.4%。男性比女性更有可能早期就表示倾向于从事麻醉职业:例如,在资格获得后的第3年,10.1%的男性选择了麻醉专业,而女性为7.9%。与早期队列相比,近期女性选择麻醉作为未来职业专业的确定性有显著增加,而男性选择麻醉的情况未观察到任何趋势。在资格获得10年后成为麻醉医生的医生中,60%在第1年接受调查时将麻醉指定为首选专业,第3年为80%,第5年为92%。与其他医院专科的医生相比,麻醉医生不太可能将“学生时期对该学科的体验”、“医学院之前的倾向”以及“我真正想做的事情”视为对专业选择有强烈影响的因素。男性麻醉医生在专业选择上比其他医院专科的男性更受“希望有可接受工作时长的职业”的影响;女性之间的相应差异不显著。
我们建议在医学院重点开展鼓舞人心的麻醉教学,并在基础培训项目中增加对该专业的接触。应探索并解决可能阻碍女性进入麻醉专业的因素。