Haddock Nicholas T, Gassman Andrew, Cho Min-Jeong, Teotia Sumeet S
Dallas, Texas; and Philadelphia, Pa.
From the Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; and the Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Temple University.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Aug;140(2):229-239. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003553.
Free and local flaps based on the profunda artery perforators were first used for reconstruction of pressure sores, burn contractures, and extremity wounds. Recently, a revised profunda artery perforator flap was introduced for breast reconstruction. However, despite increasing reports of the use of the flap, it remains a rarely used option. The authors present their early experience with the first 101 profunda artery perforator flaps used for breast reconstruction at their institution.
The authors conducted a retrospective review of the first 101 profunda artery perforator flaps at their institution. Patient demographics, perioperative data, and postoperative complications were recorded and analyzed.
One hundred one consecutive profunda artery perforator flaps were used to reconstruct 96 breasts in 56 patients. In 42 breasts, the flap was used in conjunction with another flap-with a deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (n = 36), a superior gluteal artery perforator flap (n = 1), or as stacked profunda artery perforator flaps (n = 5). Mean flap weight was 425 g (range, 170 to 815 g), and mean patient body mass index was 26.8 kg/m (range, 18.2 to 42.3 kg/m). Complications included total flap loss (2 percent), donor-site cellulitis (5.9 percent), and donor-site wound dehiscence (10.9 percent).
The profunda artery perforator flap is a safe and reliable option for breast reconstruction. Flap size is adequate for breast reconstruction in appropriately selected patients. Furthermore, it can be combined with other flaps when additional volume or skin requirements are present. Flap and donor-site complications are comparable to those of other free tissue breast reconstruction options. It is a clear second option to the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for autologous tissue reconstruction.
CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.
基于股深动脉穿支的游离皮瓣和局部皮瓣最初用于压疮、烧伤挛缩和肢体伤口的重建。最近,一种改良的股深动脉穿支皮瓣被引入用于乳房重建。然而,尽管关于该皮瓣使用的报道日益增多,但它仍然是一种很少使用的选择。作者介绍了他们在其机构中使用的前101例股深动脉穿支皮瓣进行乳房重建的早期经验。
作者对其机构的前101例股深动脉穿支皮瓣进行了回顾性研究。记录并分析了患者的人口统计学数据、围手术期数据和术后并发症。
连续101例股深动脉穿支皮瓣用于重建56例患者的96个乳房。在42个乳房中,该皮瓣与另一种皮瓣联合使用——与腹壁下深穿支皮瓣联合(n = 36)、臀上动脉穿支皮瓣联合(n = 1)或作为堆叠股深动脉穿支皮瓣联合(n = 5)。皮瓣平均重量为425 g(范围为170至815 g),患者平均体重指数为26.8 kg/m²(范围为18.2至42.3 kg/m²)。并发症包括皮瓣完全坏死(2%)、供区蜂窝织炎(5.9%)和供区伤口裂开(10.9%)。
股深动脉穿支皮瓣是乳房重建的一种安全可靠的选择。皮瓣大小对于适当选择的患者进行乳房重建是足够的。此外,当有额外的容量或皮肤需求时,它可以与其他皮瓣联合使用。皮瓣和供区并发症与其他游离组织乳房重建选择相当。对于自体组织重建,它显然是腹壁下深穿支皮瓣的第二选择。
临床问题/证据水平:治疗性,IV级。