Suppr超能文献

退伍军人事务部(VHA)中糖尿病预防计划(DPP)混合 III 实施效果试验的实施结果。

Implementation findings from a hybrid III implementation-effectiveness trial of the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA).

机构信息

Ann Arbor VA HSR&D/Center for Clinical Management Research, P.O. Box 130170, Ann Arbor, MI, 48113-0170, USA.

VA Diabetes QUERI, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

Implement Sci. 2017 Jul 26;12(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0619-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) is an effective lifestyle intervention to reduce incidence of type 2 diabetes. However, there are gaps in knowledge about how to implement DPP. The aim of this study was to evaluate implementation of DPP via assessment of a clinical demonstration in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA).

METHODS

A 12-month pragmatic clinical trial compared weight outcomes between the Veterans Affairs Diabetes Prevention Program (VA-DPP) and the usual care MOVE!® weight management program (MOVE!). Eligible participants had a body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m (or BMI ≥ 25 kg/m with one obesity-related condition), prediabetes (glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) 5.7-6.5% or fasting plasma glucose (FPG) 100-125 mg/dL), lived within 60 min of their VA site, and had not participated in a weight management program within the last year. Established evaluation and implementation frameworks were used to guide the implementation evaluation. Implementation barriers and facilitators, delivery fidelity, participant satisfaction, and implementation costs were assessed. Using micro-costing methods, costs for assessment of eligibility and scheduling and maintaining adherence per participant, as well as cost of delivery per session, were also assessed.

RESULTS

Several barriers and facilitators to Reach, Adoption, Implementation, Effectiveness and Maintenance were identified; barriers related to Reach were the largest challenge encountered by site teams. Fidelity was higher for VA-DPP delivery compared to MOVE! for five of seven domains assessed. Participant satisfaction was high in both programs, but higher in VA-DPP for most items. Based on micro-costing methods, cost of assessment for eligibility was $68/individual assessed, cost of scheduling and maintaining adherence was $328/participant, and cost of delivery was $101/session.

CONCLUSIONS

Multi-faceted strategies are needed to reach targeted participants and successfully implement DPP. Costs for assessing patients for eligibility need to be carefully considered while still maximizing reach to the targeted population.

摘要

背景

糖尿病预防计划(DPP)是一种有效的生活方式干预措施,可降低 2 型糖尿病的发病率。然而,在如何实施 DPP 方面仍存在知识空白。本研究旨在通过评估退伍军人事务部(VA)的临床示范来评估 DPP 的实施情况。

方法

一项为期 12 个月的实用临床试验比较了退伍军人事务部糖尿病预防计划(VA-DPP)与常规护理 MOVE!®体重管理计划(MOVE!)的体重结果。合格参与者的身体质量指数(BMI)≥30kg/m(或 BMI≥25kg/m 且有一个肥胖相关疾病)、前驱糖尿病(糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)5.7-6.5%或空腹血糖(FPG)100-125mg/dL)、居住在距离 VA 站点 60 分钟以内,并且在过去一年中未参加过体重管理计划。使用既定的评估和实施框架来指导实施评估。评估了实施的障碍和促进因素、交付的保真度、参与者的满意度和实施成本。使用微观成本法,还评估了每个参与者的资格评估和预约以及保持依从性的成本,以及每次课程的交付成本。

结果

确定了几个与“可达性、采用、实施、有效性和维持”相关的障碍和促进因素;与可达性相关的障碍是现场团队面临的最大挑战。与 MOVE!相比,VA-DPP 交付在七个评估领域中的五个领域具有更高的保真度。两个计划的参与者满意度都很高,但 VA-DPP 的大多数项目满意度更高。根据微观成本法,评估资格的评估成本为每人 68 美元,预约和保持依从性的成本为每人 328 美元,交付成本为每节课 101 美元。

结论

需要采取多方面的策略来接触目标参与者并成功实施 DPP。在最大限度地覆盖目标人群的同时,还需要仔细考虑评估患者资格的成本。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fac1/5530572/9057edf878cc/13012_2017_619_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验