Department of Psychology, University of Tennessee, 1404 Circle Drive, Knoxville, TN, 37996, USA.
Department of Psychology, University of Tennessee, Room 301F, 1404 Circle Drive, Knoxville, TN, 37996, USA.
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2018 May;46(4):795-809. doi: 10.1007/s10802-017-0328-z.
This study examined whether social preference was a mechanism that explained the relation between proactive and reactive aggression and peer victimization. Participants were 494 children in grades 2-5. Proactive and reactive aggression was assessed via a self-report measure and indices of social preference and peer victimization were assessed via a peer nomination inventory. Data was collected during the fall and spring of two academic years. The relations among aggression, social preference, and peer victimization varied as a function of aggression and gender. For girls, reactive aggression was a significant negative predictor of social preference. Findings also revealed social preference mediated the relation between reactive aggression and peer victimization for girls. This pathway did not hold for boys. There was some evidence that proactive aggression was negatively associated with peer victimization, but only for girls. Findings from the current study suggest social preference may be a key mechanism through which reactive aggression is associated with future victimization for girls. Boys' aggression was not related to subsequent peer victimization. Future research and intervention efforts should consider gender differences and the function of aggression when investigating children's peer victimization experiences.
本研究考察了社交偏好是否是解释主动性和反应性攻击与同伴侵害之间关系的一种机制。参与者为 2-5 年级的 494 名儿童。通过自我报告量表评估主动性和反应性攻击,通过同伴提名清单评估社交偏好和同伴侵害指数。数据在两个学年的秋季和春季收集。攻击性、社交偏好和同伴侵害之间的关系因攻击性和性别而异。对于女孩来说,反应性攻击是社交偏好的显著负向预测指标。研究结果还表明,对于女孩来说,社交偏好中介了反应性攻击与同伴侵害之间的关系。对于男孩来说,这种关系并不存在。有一些证据表明,主动性攻击与女孩的同伴侵害呈负相关。本研究的结果表明,社交偏好可能是反应性攻击与女孩未来受侵害相关的关键机制。男孩的攻击性与随后的同伴侵害无关。未来的研究和干预工作应该考虑到性别差异以及攻击性的作用,在调查儿童的同伴侵害经历时。