Shah Jayun M, Shah Kairav S, Kumar Jinendra, Sundaram Ponraj K
Department of Neurosurgery, Goa Medical College, Goa, India.
Asian J Neurosurg. 2017 Jul-Sep;12(3):412-415. doi: 10.4103/1793-5482.180968.
Computed tomography (CT) has become the primary investigative modality for traumatic brain injury (TBI) and there are established guidelines for the initial CT (CT-1). There are no specific guidelines for scheduling repeat CT in TBI. This study was carried out to compare the usefulness of unscheduled repeat CT (UCT-2) with scheduled repeat CT (SCT-2) in the presence or absence of neurological deterioration and to identify risk factors associated with radiological worsening (RW).
This prospective study comprised admitted patients with mild and moderate TBI between February and May, 2014 and all patients were subjected to repeat CT brain. Patients with penetrating brain injuries and surgical conditions after CT-1, and age < 5 years were excluded. Positive yield after the second CT (SCT-2 and UCT-2) leading to modification of management were compared between the two groups.
In this study, 214 patients (214/222) underwent SCT-2 and 8 underwent UCT-2 (8/222). Surgery was required in 2 (0.9%) from the first group and 7 (87.5%) in the latter. UCT-2 was more likely to show RW warranting surgery as compared to SCT-2 ( < 0.05). In the SCT-2 group, CT-1 had been done within 2 h after trauma in 30 patients and 8 (8/30; 26.7%) showed RW and; after 2 h in the remaining 184 (184/214) with RW seen in 23 (23/184; 12.5%). RW was more common when the CT-1 was within 2 h from trauma ( < 0.05). In our study, the age of the patient and admission Glasgow Coma Scores did not significantly affect the findings in repeat CT.
Repeating CT brain is costly besides needing significant logistical support to shift an injured and often unstable patient. SCT-2 is more likely to show RW when CT-1 is done within 2 h after trauma. UCT-2 is more likely to show RW and findings warranting surgery as compared to SCT-2. Hence, a repeat CT may be preferred only in the presence of clinical worsening and when CT-1 is done within 2 h after trauma.
计算机断层扫描(CT)已成为创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的主要检查方式,并且已有针对初次CT(CT-1)的既定指南。但在TBI中尚无安排重复CT检查的具体指南。本研究旨在比较在有或无神经功能恶化情况下,非计划重复CT(UCT-2)与计划重复CT(SCT-2)的效用,并确定与放射学恶化(RW)相关的危险因素。
这项前瞻性研究纳入了2014年2月至5月间收治的轻度和中度TBI患者,所有患者均接受了脑部重复CT检查。排除CT-1后有穿透性脑损伤和手术情况以及年龄<5岁的患者。比较两组第二次CT(SCT-2和UCT-2)后导致治疗方案改变的阳性检出率。
在本研究中,214例患者(214/222)接受了SCT-2检查,8例(8/222)接受了UCT-2检查。第一组中有2例(0.9%)需要手术,后一组中有7例(87.5%)需要手术。与SCT-2相比,UCT-2更有可能显示需要手术的RW(<0.05)。在SCT-2组中,30例患者在创伤后2小时内进行了CT-1检查,其中8例(8/30;26.7%)显示有RW;其余184例(184/214)在创伤后2小时后进行CT-1检查,其中23例(23/184;12.5%)显示有RW。当CT-1在创伤后2小时内进行时,RW更为常见(<0.05)。在我们的研究中,患者年龄和入院时格拉斯哥昏迷评分对重复CT检查结果没有显著影响。
重复脑部CT检查不仅成本高昂,而且需要大量后勤支持来转移受伤且通常不稳定的患者。当CT-1在创伤后2小时内进行时,SCT-2更有可能显示RW。与SCT-2相比,UCT-2更有可能显示RW且检查结果需要手术。因此,仅在临床病情恶化且CT-1在创伤后2小时内进行时,才可能更倾向于进行重复CT检查。