Rooholamini Azadeh, Amini Mitra, Bazrafkan Leila, Dehghani Mohammad Reza, Esmaeilzadeh Zohreh, Nabeiei Parisa, Rezaee Rita, Kojuri Javad
Clinical Education Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2017 Jul;5(3):148-154.
In recent years curriculum reform and integration was done in many medical schools. The integrated curriculum is a popular concept all over the world. In Shiraz medical school, the reform was initiated by stablishing the horizontal basic science integration model and Early Clinical Exposure (ECE) for undergraduate medical education. The purpose of this study was to provide the required data for the program evaluation of this curriculum for undergraduate medical students, using CIPP program evaluation model.
This study is an analytic descriptive and triangulation mixed method study which was carried out in Shiraz Medical School in 2012, based on the views of professors of basic sciences courses and first and second year medical students. The study evaluated the quality of the relationship between basic sciences and clinical courses and the method of presenting such courses based on the Context, Input, Process and Product (CIPP) model. The tools for collecting data, both quantitatively and qualitatively, were some questionnaires, content analysis of portfolios, semi- structured interview and brain storming sessions. For quantitative data analysis, SPSS software, version 14, was used.
In the context evaluation by modified DREEM questionnaire, 77.75%of the students believed that this educational system encourages them to actively participate in classes. Course schedule and atmosphere of class were reported suitable by 87.81% and 83.86% of students. In input domain that was measured by a researcher made questionnaire, the facilities for education were acceptable except for shortage of cadavers. In process evaluation, the quality of integrated modules presentation and Early Clinical Exposure (ECE) was good from the students' viewpoint. In product evaluation, students' brain storming, students' portfolio and semi-structured interview with faculties were done, showing some positive aspects of integration and some areas that need improvement.
The main advantage of assessing an educational program based on CIPP evaluation model is that the context, input, process and product of the program are viewed and evaluated systematically. This will help the educational authorities to make proper decisions based on the weaknesses and strengths of the program on its continuation, cessation and revision. Based on the results of this study, the integrated basic sciences course for undergraduate medical students in Shiraz Medical School is at a desirable level. However, attempts to improve or reform some sections and continual evaluation of the program and its accreditation seem to be necessary.
近年来,许多医学院校都进行了课程改革与整合。整合课程是一个在全球范围内都很流行的概念。在设拉子医学院,改革是通过建立本科医学教育的横向基础科学整合模式和早期临床接触(ECE)来启动的。本研究的目的是使用CIPP课程评估模型为该本科医学课程的项目评估提供所需数据。
本研究是一项分析性描述性和三角测量混合方法研究,于2012年在设拉子医学院开展,基于基础科学课程教授以及医学专业一、二年级学生的观点。该研究根据背景、投入、过程和产出(CIPP)模型评估了基础科学与临床课程之间关系的质量以及此类课程的呈现方式。收集定量和定性数据的工具包括一些问卷、档案袋内容分析、半结构化访谈和头脑风暴会议。定量数据分析使用了SPSS 14.0软件。
在使用改良的DREEM问卷进行的背景评估中,77.75%的学生认为该教育系统鼓励他们积极参与课堂。87.81%和83.86%的学生分别表示课程安排和课堂氛围合适。在通过研究者编制的问卷进行测量的投入领域,除尸体短缺外,教育设施尚可接受。在过程评估中,从学生的角度来看,整合模块的呈现质量和早期临床接触(ECE)良好。在产出评估中,进行了学生头脑风暴、学生档案袋分析以及与教师的半结构化访谈,显示出整合的一些积极方面以及一些需要改进的领域。
基于CIPP评估模型评估教育项目的主要优势在于,该项目的背景、投入、过程和产出能够得到系统的审视和评估。这将有助于教育当局根据该项目在延续、终止和修订方面的优缺点做出恰当决策。根据本研究结果,设拉子医学院本科医学专业的基础科学整合课程处于理想水平。然而,似乎有必要尝试改进或改革某些部分,并对该项目进行持续评估及其认证。