Sasaguri Hiroki, Nilsson Per, Hashimoto Shoko, Nagata Kenichi, Saito Takashi, De Strooper Bart, Hardy John, Vassar Robert, Winblad Bengt, Saido Takaomi C
Laboratory for Proteolytic Neuroscience, RIKEN Brain Science Institute, Wako, Japan
Department of Neurology and Neurological Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
EMBO J. 2017 Sep 1;36(17):2473-2487. doi: 10.15252/embj.201797397. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
Animal models of human diseases that accurately recapitulate clinical pathology are indispensable for understanding molecular mechanisms and advancing preclinical studies. The Alzheimer's disease (AD) research community has historically used first-generation transgenic (Tg) mouse models that overexpress proteins linked to familial AD (FAD), mutant amyloid precursor protein (APP), or APP and presenilin (PS). These mice exhibit AD pathology, but the overexpression paradigm may cause additional phenotypes unrelated to AD Second-generation mouse models contain humanized sequences and clinical mutations in the endogenous mouse gene. These mice show Aβ accumulation without phenotypes related to overexpression but are not yet a clinical recapitulation of human AD In this review, we evaluate different APP mouse models of AD, and review recent studies using the second-generation mice. We advise AD researchers to consider the comparative strengths and limitations of each model against the scientific and therapeutic goal of a prospective preclinical study.
能够准确重现临床病理的人类疾病动物模型对于理解分子机制和推进临床前研究而言不可或缺。阿尔茨海默病(AD)研究领域历来使用第一代转基因(Tg)小鼠模型,这些模型过度表达与家族性AD(FAD)、突变淀粉样前体蛋白(APP)或APP和早老素(PS)相关的蛋白质。这些小鼠表现出AD病理特征,但过表达模式可能会导致与AD无关的其他表型。第二代小鼠模型在内源性小鼠基因中包含人源化序列和临床突变。这些小鼠显示出Aβ积累,但没有与过表达相关的表型,不过仍未在临床上重现人类AD。在本综述中,我们评估了不同的AD的APP小鼠模型,并回顾了使用第二代小鼠的近期研究。我们建议AD研究人员根据前瞻性临床前研究的科学和治疗目标,考虑每种模型的相对优势和局限性。