Kaundal Nirmal, Sarkate Purva, Prakash Charu, Rishi Narayan
Virology-1 Laboratory, Microbiology Division, National Centre for Disease Control, 22-Shamnath Marg, Delhi, 110054 India.
Microbiology Division, National Centre for Disease Control, 22-Shamnath Marg, Delhi, 110054 India.
Virusdisease. 2017 Jun;28(2):141-145. doi: 10.1007/s13337-017-0378-4. Epub 2017 May 25.
Environmental surveillance of polioviruses has been used as an important tool in monitoring circulation of wild polioviruses and/or Vaccine derived polioviruses in sewage samples. It is important to distinguish Sabin like isolates from non-Sabin like; ELISA & dual stage real time RT-PCR have been used for the same. Current study was carried out on sewage isolates to compare ELISA & RT-PCR with sequencing to distinguish Sabin like from non-Sabin like. Out of 468 sewage specimens, 91 (19.44%) were non-polio enteroviruses positive and 377 (80.56%) were polio positive by virus isolation method. A total of 488 polio virus isolates were detected by L20B and RD route which were further subjected to ELISA and RT-PCR. The results were compared with sequencing. On comparison, the specificity of ELISA was only 66.67% in spite of very low sensitivity (3.43%). The sensitivity of RT-PCR was 97.71% which makes it a good primary screening test for detection of non-Sabin like viruses. However, the specificity was only 33.33%. RT-PCR appears to be a sensitive tool for detecting non-Sabin like viruses however; the isolates which are non-Sabin like by RT-PCR may not necessarily be mutated viruses. ELISA cannot be used for differentiation of Sabin likes from non-Sabin likes due to low sensitivity.
脊髓灰质炎病毒的环境监测已成为监测污水样本中野生脊髓灰质炎病毒和/或疫苗衍生脊髓灰质炎病毒传播情况的重要工具。区分萨宾样毒株和非萨宾样毒株很重要;为此已采用酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)和双阶段实时逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)。本研究对污水分离株进行检测,以比较ELISA、RT-PCR和测序在区分萨宾样毒株和非萨宾样毒株方面的效果。在468份污水样本中,采用病毒分离法检测出91份(19.44%)为非脊髓灰质炎肠道病毒阳性,377份(80.56%)为脊髓灰质炎病毒阳性。通过L20B和RD途径共检测到488株脊髓灰质炎病毒分离株,并进一步进行ELISA和RT-PCR检测。将结果与测序结果进行比较。结果显示,尽管ELISA灵敏度极低(3.43%),但其特异性仅为66.67%。RT-PCR的灵敏度为97.71%,这使其成为检测非萨宾样病毒的良好初筛试验。然而,其特异性仅为33.33%。RT-PCR似乎是检测非萨宾样病毒的灵敏工具;然而,通过RT-PCR检测为非萨宾样的分离株不一定是突变病毒。由于灵敏度较低,ELISA不能用于区分萨宾样毒株和非萨宾样毒株。