Leonetti Danilo, Tigani Domenico
Grande Ospedale Metropolitano, Reggio Calabria, Italy.
Ospedale Maggiore "CA Pizzardi", Bologna, Italy.
Injury. 2017 Oct;48(10):2311-2317. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.07.026. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
Actually, pilon fractures are classified according to AO and Ruedi Allgower classification systems based on X-rays. These classifications are less reproducible and do not provide necessary information for proper surgical planning. Aim of the study is to (1) propose a new classification system based on CT scan; (2) to check the prognostic value of this classification and (3) to evaluate its reliability and (4) reproducibility. We retrospectively reviewed 71 cases of pilon fracture. All fractures were classified according to AO, Ruedi Allgower and new proposed classification system by 5 surgeons. Clinical and radiographic evaluation were performed at a mean follow-up of 36 months. Cohen's K value was calculated in order to evaluate the interobserver and intraobserver agreement. Sixty-four of 71 fractures healed. Average AOFAS score was 91,7±7,8 in the Type I of new classification proposed, 87,7±7,8 in the Type II, 82±18,6 in type III, and 67,2±20,9 in type IV. Using the AO classification system the average K weighted value among the five reviewers was 0,51; using Ruedi Allgower classification it was 0,50 and using the new classification system it was 0,88 (p<0.0005). This study demonstrated that the new classification system is prognostic, reliable and reproducible. Moreover it provides a new treatment-oriented classification for this challenging fracture which affect the quality of life of the patients more than chronic diseases like diabetes and coronaropathy or pelvic fractures.
实际上,根据AO和鲁迪·阿尔高弗(Ruedi Allgower)分类系统,基于X线对Pilon骨折进行分类。这些分类的可重复性较差,并且不能为恰当的手术规划提供必要信息。本研究的目的是:(1)基于CT扫描提出一种新的分类系统;(2)检验该分类的预后价值;(3)评估其可靠性;(4)评估其可重复性。我们回顾性分析了71例Pilon骨折病例。5位外科医生根据AO、鲁迪·阿尔高弗和新提出的分类系统对所有骨折进行分类。在平均36个月的随访期进行临床和影像学评估。计算科恩K值以评估观察者间和观察者内的一致性。71例骨折中有64例愈合。新提出的分类系统中,I型骨折的平均美国足踝外科协会(AOFAS)评分为91.7±7.8,II型为87.7±7.8,III型为82±18.6,IV型为67.2±20.9。使用AO分类系统时,5位评估者的平均K加权值为0.51;使用鲁迪·阿尔高弗分类系统时为0.50,而使用新分类系统时为0.88(p<0.0005)。本研究表明,新分类系统具有预后价值、可靠性和可重复性。此外,对于这种比糖尿病、冠心病或骨盆骨折等慢性疾病更影响患者生活质量的具有挑战性的骨折,它提供了一种新的以治疗为导向的分类方法。