McCravy Kenneth W, Ruholl Jared D
Department of Biological Sciences, Western Illinois University, 1 University Circle, Macomb, IL 61455, USA.
USDA-Farm Service Agency, RR3 Box 129A, Carrollton, IL 62016, USA.
Insects. 2017 Aug 4;8(3):81. doi: 10.3390/insects8030081.
Forests provide potentially important bee habitat, but little research has been done on forest bee diversity and the relative effectiveness of bee sampling methods in this environment. Bee diversity and sampling methodology were studied in an Illinois, USA upland oak-hickory forest using elevated and ground-level pan traps, malaise traps, and vane traps. 854 bees and 55 bee species were collected. Elevated pan traps collected the greatest number of bees (473), but ground-level pan traps collected greater species diversity (based on Simpson's diversity index) than did elevated pan traps. Elevated and ground-level pan traps collected the greatest bee species richness, with 43 and 39 species, respectively. An estimated sample size increase of over 18-fold would be required to approach minimum asymptotic richness using ground-level pan traps. Among pan trap colors/elevations, elevated yellow pan traps collected the greatest number of bees (266) but the lowest diversity. Malaise traps were relatively ineffective, collecting only 17 bees. Vane traps collected relatively low species richness (14 species), and Chao1 and abundance coverage estimators suggested that minimum asymptotic species richness was approached for that method. Bee species composition differed significantly between elevated pan traps, ground-level pan traps, and vane traps. Indicator species were significantly associated with each of these trap types, as well as with particular pan trap colors/elevations. These results indicate that Midwestern deciduous forests provide important bee habitat, and that the performance of common bee sampling methods varies substantially in this environment.
森林为蜜蜂提供了潜在的重要栖息地,但针对森林蜜蜂多样性以及在此环境下蜜蜂采样方法的相对有效性的研究却很少。在美国伊利诺伊州的一片山地栎树-山核桃树林中,利用高悬式和地面诱虫盘、马氏网和风向标式诱捕器对蜜蜂多样性和采样方法进行了研究。共收集到854只蜜蜂和55个蜜蜂物种。高悬式诱虫盘收集到的蜜蜂数量最多(473只),但地面诱虫盘收集到的物种多样性(基于辛普森多样性指数)高于高悬式诱虫盘。高悬式和地面诱虫盘收集到的蜜蜂物种丰富度最高,分别为43种和39种。若使用地面诱虫盘,估计样本量需增加18倍以上才能接近最小渐近丰富度。在诱虫盘颜色/高度中,高悬式黄色诱虫盘收集到的蜜蜂数量最多(266只),但多样性最低。马氏网相对无效,仅收集到17只蜜蜂。风向标式诱捕器收集到的物种丰富度相对较低(共14种),Chao1指数和丰度覆盖率估计表明该方法接近最小渐近物种丰富度。高悬式诱虫盘、地面诱虫盘和风向标式诱捕器收集到的蜜蜂物种组成存在显著差异。指示物种与这些诱捕器类型以及特定的诱虫盘颜色/高度均显著相关。这些结果表明,中西部落叶林为蜜蜂提供了重要栖息地,并且常见蜜蜂采样方法在此环境下的表现差异很大。