Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, PO Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark.
Knowledge Center for Agriculture (SEGES), DK-8200 Aarhus N, Skejby, Denmark.
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Oct;100(10):8188-8196. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13122. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the improvement of the accuracy of estimated breeding values for ability to recycle after calving by using information of genomic markers and phenotypic information of correlated traits. The traits in this study were the interval from calving to first insemination (CFI), based on artificial insemination data, and the interval from calving to first high activity (CFHA), recorded from activity tags, which could better measure ability to recycle after caving. The phenotypic data set included 1,472,313 records from 820,218 cows for CFI, and 36,504 records from 25,733 cows for CFHA. The genomic information was available for 3,159 progeny-tested sires, which were genotyped using Illumina Bovine SNP50 BeadChip (Illumina, San Diego, CA). Heritability estimates were 0.06 for the interval from calving to first insemination and 0.14 for the interval from calving to first high activity, and the genetic correlation between both traits was strong (0.87). Breeding values were obtained using 4 models: conventional single-trait BLUP; conventional multitrait BLUP with pedigree-based relationship matrix; single-trait single-step genomic BLUP; and multitrait single-step genomic BLUP model with joint relationship matrix combining pedigree and genomic information. The results showed that reliabilities of estimated breeding values (EBV) from single-step genomic BLUP models were about 40% higher than those from conventional BLUP models for both traits. Furthermore, using a multitrait model doubled the reliability of breeding values for CFHA, whereas no gain was observed for CFI. The best model was the multitrait single-step genomic BLUP, which resulted in a reliability of EBV 0.19 for CFHA and 0.14 for CFI. The results indicate that even though a relatively small number of records for CFHA were available, with genomic information and using multitrait model, the reliability of EBV for CFHA is acceptable. Thus, it is feasible to include CFHA in Nordic Holstein breeding evaluations to improve fertility performance.
本研究旨在通过使用基因组标记信息和相关性状的表型信息,来提高产后配种能力的估计育种值的准确性。本研究的性状为基于人工授精数据的产后至首次输精间隔(CFI)和来自活动标签的产后至首次高活动间隔(CFHA),它们可以更好地衡量产后的复配能力。表型数据集包括来自 820,218 头奶牛的 1,472,313 个 CFI 记录和来自 25,733 头奶牛的 36,504 个 CFHA 记录。基因组信息可用于 3,159 头经过后裔测试的种公牛,这些公牛使用 Illumina Bovine SNP50 BeadChip(Illumina,圣地亚哥,CA)进行了基因分型。CFI 的遗传力估计值为 0.06,CFHA 的遗传力估计值为 0.14,两个性状之间的遗传相关性很强(0.87)。使用 4 种模型获得了育种值:常规单性状 BLUP;基于系谱的关系矩阵的常规多性状 BLUP;单性状一步基因组 BLUP;以及结合系谱和基因组信息的联合关系矩阵的多性状一步基因组 BLUP 模型。结果表明,对于两个性状,单步基因组 BLUP 模型的估计育种值(EBV)可靠性比常规 BLUP 模型高约 40%。此外,使用多性状模型将 CFHA 的育种值可靠性提高了一倍,而 CFI 则没有提高。最佳模型是多性状一步基因组 BLUP,CFHA 的 EBV 可靠性为 0.19,CFI 的 EBV 可靠性为 0.14。结果表明,尽管 CFHA 的记录数量相对较少,但通过基因组信息和多性状模型,CFHA 的 EBV 可靠性是可以接受的。因此,在北欧荷斯坦牛的育种评估中包含 CFHA 以提高繁殖性能是可行的。