Poon Liona C, Wright David, Rolnik Daniel L, Syngelaki Argyro, Delgado Juan Luis, Tsokaki Theodora, Leipold Gergo, Akolekar Ranjit, Shearing Siobhan, De Stefani Luciana, Jani Jacques C, Plasencia Walter, Evangelinakis Nikolaos, Gonzalez-Vanegas Otilia, Persico Nicola, Nicolaides Kypros H
King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov;217(5):585.e1-585.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.07.038. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
The Combined Multimarker Screening and Randomized Patient Treatment with Aspirin for Evidence-Based Preeclampsia Prevention trial demonstrated that in women who were at high risk for preterm preeclampsia with delivery at <37 weeks' gestation identified by screening by means of an algorithm that combines maternal factors and biomarkers at 11-13 weeks' gestation, aspirin administration from 11 to 14 until 36 weeks' gestation was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of preterm preeclampsia (odds ratio 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.20 to 0.74; P=0.004).
We sought to examine whether there are differences in the effect of aspirin on the incidence of preterm preeclampsia in the Aspirin for Evidence-Based Preeclampsia Prevention trial in subgroups defined according to maternal characteristics and medical and obstetrical history.
This was a secondary analysis of data from the Aspirin for Evidence-Based Preeclampsia Prevention trial. Subgroup analysis was performed to assess evidence of differences in the effect of aspirin on incidence of preterm preeclampsia in subgroups defined by maternal age (<30 and ≥30 years), body mass index (<25 and ≥25 kg/m), racial origin (Afro-Caribbean, Caucasian and other), method of conception (natural and assisted), cigarette smoking (smoker and non-smoker), family history of preterm preeclampsia (present and absent), obstetrical history (nulliparous, multiparous with previous preterm preeclampsia and multiparous without previous preterm preeclampsia), history of chronic hypertension (present and absent). Interaction tests were performed on the full data set of patients in the intention to treat population and on the data set of patients who took ≥ 90% of the prescribed medication. Results are presented as forest plot with P values for the interaction effects, group sizes, event counts and estimated odds ratios. We examined whether the test of interaction was significant at the 5% level with a Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons.
There was no evidence of heterogeneity in the aspirin effect in subgroups defined according to maternal characteristics and obstetrical history. In participants with chronic hypertension preterm preeclampsia occurred in 10.2% (5/49) in the aspirin group and 8.2% (5/61) in the placebo group (adjusted odds ratio, 1.29; 95% confidence interval, 0.33-5.12). The respective values in those without chronic hypertension were 1.1% (8/749) in the aspirin group and 3.9% (30/761) in the placebo group (adjusted odds ratio, 0.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.12-0.60). In all participants with adherence of ≥90% the adjusted odds ratio in the aspirin group was 0.24 (95% confidence interval, 0.09-0.65); in the subgroup with chronic hypertension it was 2.06 (95% confidence interval, 0.40-10.71); and in those without chronic hypertension it was 0.05 (95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.41). For the complete data set the test of interaction was not significant at the 5% level (P = .055), but in those with adherence ≥90%, after adjustment for multiple comparisons, the interaction was significant at the 5% level (P = .0019).
The beneficial effect of aspirin in the prevention of preterm preeclampsia may not apply in pregnancies with chronic hypertension. There was no evidence of heterogeneity in the aspirin effect in subgroups defined according to maternal characteristics and obstetrical history.
“基于循证医学的子痫前期预防联合多标志物筛查及随机患者阿司匹林治疗”试验表明,对于通过在妊娠11 - 13周结合母体因素和生物标志物的算法筛查出的妊娠<37周早产子痫前期高危女性,从妊娠11至14周直至36周给予阿司匹林治疗与早产子痫前期发病率显著降低相关(比值比0.38;95%置信区间,0.20至0.74;P = 0.004)。
我们试图研究在“基于循证医学的子痫前期预防阿司匹林治疗”试验中,根据母体特征以及医疗和产科病史定义的亚组中,阿司匹林对早产子痫前期发病率的影响是否存在差异。
这是对“基于循证医学的子痫前期预防阿司匹林治疗”试验数据的二次分析。进行亚组分析以评估在按母体年龄(<30岁和≥30岁)、体重指数(<25和≥25 kg/m²)、种族(非洲 - 加勒比裔、白种人和其他)、受孕方式(自然受孕和辅助受孕)、吸烟情况(吸烟者和非吸烟者)、早产子痫前期家族史(有和无)、产科病史(初产妇、有既往早产子痫前期的经产妇和无既往早产子痫前期的经产妇)、慢性高血压病史(有和无)定义的亚组中,阿司匹林对早产子痫前期发病率影响差异的证据。对意向性治疗人群的全部患者数据集以及服用≥90%规定药物的患者数据集进行交互作用检验。结果以森林图呈现,包括交互作用效应的P值、组大小、事件数和估计的比值比。我们通过Bonferroni多重比较调整检验交互作用在5%水平是否显著。
在根据母体特征和产科病史定义的亚组中,没有证据表明阿司匹林效应存在异质性。在慢性高血压患者中,阿司匹林组早产子痫前期发生率为10.2%(5/49),安慰剂组为8.2%(5/61)(调整后比值比,1.29;95%置信区间,0.33 - 5.12)。无慢性高血压患者中,阿司匹林组相应值为1.1%(8/749),安慰剂组为3.9%(30/761)(调整后比值比,0.27;95%置信区间,0.12 - 0.60)。在所有依从性≥90%的参与者中,阿司匹林组调整后比值比为0.24(95%置信区间,0.09 - 0.65);在慢性高血压亚组中为2.06(95%置信区间,0.40 - 10.71);在无慢性高血压者中为0.05(95%置信区间,0.01 - 0.41)。对于完整数据集,交互作用检验在5%水平不显著(P = 0.055),但在依从性≥90%者中,经多重比较调整后,交互作用在5%水平显著(P = 0.0019)。
阿司匹林在预防早产子痫前期方面的有益作用可能不适用于合并慢性高血压的妊娠。在根据母体特征和产科病史定义的亚组中,没有证据表明阿司匹林效应存在异质性。