School of Chemistry, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia.
J Inorg Biochem. 2017 Dec;177:328-334. doi: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2017.07.029. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
The continued use of platinum-based chemotherapeutic drugs in the clinic mandates the need for further investigation of the biological activity of structural analogues of the clinically approved complexes. Of interest are monofunctional platinum(II) complexes, which bear only one labile ligand, for which it is believed that each complex binds to DNA only once. Pyriplatin ([PtCl(NH)(py)]) and enpyriplatin ([PtCl(en)(py)]) are both monofunctional platinum(II) complexes that bear a pyridine ligand and a labile chlorido ligand, differing in their cis‑ammine and ethane-1,2-diamine (en) ligands respectively. Despite their similar structure, the complexes exhibit dramatically different cytotoxicities. In this study, we synthesized and characterized both complexes in terms of their cytotoxicity, lipophilicity, DNA binding and cellular accumulation. There was no significant difference between the lipophilicities of the complexes and both complexes exhibited monofunctional type binding, but it was the temporal accumulation profiles of the two complexes which differed greatly. The complexes were further analyzed with size exclusion chromatography coupled with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (SEC-ICP-MS) to determine the platination state of the proteins. Consistent with the accumulation studies, pyriplatin bound to proteins in far greater amounts than enpyriplatin, and this study also revealed some different protein targets between the bifunctional cisplatin and monofunctional pyriplatin. This study highlights the need for more sophisticated techniques, such as SEC-ICP-MS, to determine not only how much of a platinum complex accumulates in cells, but also the speciation and metabolites of platinum anticancer drugs.
临床上继续使用铂类化疗药物,这就要求我们进一步研究临床批准的配合物的结构类似物的生物学活性。人们对只带有一个不稳定配体的单功能铂(II)配合物很感兴趣,据信每个配合物仅与 DNA 结合一次。吡嗪铂([PtCl(NH)(py)])和乙二胺吡嗪铂([PtCl(en)(py)])都是带有吡啶配体和不稳定氯配体的单功能铂(II)配合物,它们的顺式-氨和 1,2-乙二胺(en)配体分别不同。尽管它们的结构相似,但这些配合物表现出明显不同的细胞毒性。在这项研究中,我们从细胞毒性、亲脂性、DNA 结合和细胞积累等方面对两种配合物进行了合成和表征。两种配合物的亲脂性没有显著差异,且均表现出单功能型结合,但两种配合物的时间积累曲线差异很大。通过尺寸排阻色谱与电感耦合等离子体质谱(SEC-ICP-MS)联用对配合物进行进一步分析,以确定蛋白质的铂化状态。与积累研究一致,吡嗪铂与蛋白质的结合量远大于乙二胺吡嗪铂,该研究还揭示了双功能顺铂和单功能吡嗪铂之间的一些不同的蛋白质靶标。这项研究强调需要更复杂的技术,如 SEC-ICP-MS,不仅要确定铂类抗癌药物在细胞内的积累量,还要确定其形态和代谢物。