Cronin Katherine A, Jacobson Sarah L, Bonnie Kristin E, Hopper Lydia M
Lester E. Fisher Center for the Study and Conservation of Apes, Lincoln Park Zoo, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
Department of Psychology, Beloit College, Beloit, WI, United States of America.
PeerJ. 2017 Aug 3;5:e3649. doi: 10.7717/peerj.3649. eCollection 2017.
Studying animal cognition in a social setting is associated with practical and statistical challenges. However, conducting cognitive research without disturbing species-typical social groups can increase ecological validity, minimize distress, and improve animal welfare. Here, we review the existing literature on cognitive research run with primates in a social setting in order to determine how widespread such testing is and highlight approaches that may guide future research planning.
Using Google Scholar to search the terms "primate" "cognition" "experiment" and "social group," we conducted a systematic literature search covering 16 years (2000-2015 inclusive). We then conducted two supplemental searches within each journal that contained a publication meeting our criteria in the original search, using the terms "primate" and "playback" in one search and the terms "primate" "cognition" and "social group" in the second. The results were used to assess how frequently nonhuman primate cognition has been studied in a social setting (>3 individuals), to gain perspective on the species and topics that have been studied, and to extract successful approaches for social testing.
Our search revealed 248 unique publications in 43 journals encompassing 71 species. The absolute number of publications has increased over years, suggesting viable strategies for studying cognition in social settings. While a wide range of species were studied they were not equally represented, with 19% of the publications reporting data for chimpanzees. Field sites were the most common environment for experiments run in social groups of primates, accounting for more than half of the results. Approaches to mitigating the practical and statistical challenges were identified.
This analysis has revealed that the study of primate cognition in a social setting is increasing and taking place across a range of environments. This literature review calls attention to examples that may provide valuable models for researchers wishing to overcome potential practical and statistical challenges to studying cognition in a social setting, ultimately increasing validity and improving the welfare of the primates we study.
在社会环境中研究动物认知存在实际和统计方面的挑战。然而,在不干扰物种典型社会群体的情况下进行认知研究可以提高生态效度、将痛苦降至最低并改善动物福利。在此,我们回顾了关于在社会环境中对灵长类动物进行认知研究的现有文献,以确定此类测试的普及程度,并强调可能指导未来研究规划的方法。
我们使用谷歌学术搜索“灵长类动物”“认知”“实验”和“社会群体”等术语,进行了一项涵盖16年(2000年至2015年,含这两年)的系统文献搜索。然后,我们在每份包含原始搜索中符合我们标准的出版物的期刊内进行了两次补充搜索,一次使用“灵长类动物”和“回放”这两个术语,另一次使用“灵长类动物”“认知”和“社会群体”这几个术语。这些结果用于评估在社会环境(超过3个个体)中对非人灵长类动物认知进行研究的频率,了解已研究的物种和主题,并提取社会测试的成功方法。
我们的搜索在43种期刊中发现了248篇独特的出版物,涵盖71个物种。出版物的绝对数量多年来有所增加,这表明在社会环境中研究认知有可行的策略。虽然研究了广泛的物种,但它们的代表性并不均衡——19%的出版物报告了黑猩猩的数据。实地场所是在灵长类动物社会群体中进行实验最常见的环境,占结果的一半以上。我们确定了应对实际和统计挑战的方法。
该分析表明,在社会环境中对灵长类动物认知的研究正在增加,且在一系列环境中都有开展。这篇文献综述提请注意一些例子,这些例子可能为希望克服在社会环境中研究认知的潜在实际和统计挑战的研究人员提供有价值的模型,最终提高效度并改善我们所研究的灵长类动物的福利。