Suppr超能文献

抗精神病药物联合治疗:一项纵向实用试验的分析

Combination Antipsychotic Therapies: An Analysis From a Longitudinal Pragmatic Trial.

作者信息

Foster Adriana, Buckley Peter, Lauriello John, Looney Stephen, Schooler Nina

机构信息

From the *Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL; †Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, GA; ‡Department of Psychiatry, University of Missouri, MO; Departments of §Biostatistics and Epidemiology, and ∥Oral Health and Diagnostic Sciences, Augusta University, GA; and ¶Schizophrenia Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, NY.

出版信息

J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2017 Oct;37(5):595-599. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000000766.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Combination antipsychotics (CAs) are prescribed in schizophrenia despite limited evidence of efficacy. To explore the effect of switching from CA to monotherapy, we performed an exploratory analysis of the PROACTIVE (Preventing Relapse in Schizophrenia: Oral Antipsychotics Compared with Injectables: Evaluating Efficacy) study data, in which 305 patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder were followed for 30 months after randomization to long-acting injectable (LAI) risperidone or second-generation oral antipsychotic (OA).

METHODS

Patients who entered the PROACTIVE study on CA (n = 50), LAI (n = 20), or OA (n = 206) were compared in terms of time to relapse and clinical measures.

FINDINGS

The OA group had significantly fewer hospitalizations than the CA group (P = 0.009) at baseline. In the CA group, 68% patients relapsed versus 53% in the LAI, and 52% in the OA groups. Although there was no significant difference in the relapse rate among groups on χ test (χ = 3.85, P = 0.146), the log-rank test showed a significant difference among the groups in time to first relapse (χ = 6.81, P = 0.033), with significantly longer time to relapse in the OA group (mean, 562.8 days) than in the CA group (mean, 409.5; P = 0.011). The LAI group's mean time to first relapse (594 days) was not significantly different from the other groups. However, after adjusting for number of hospitalizations, group was no longer significant (hazard ratio, 1.541; P = 0.052).

IMPLICATIONS

Based on our exploratory analysis, taking antipsychotic combinations predicts earlier relapse and calls for additional treatment guidance in schizophrenia.

摘要

背景

尽管联合使用抗精神病药物(CAs)治疗精神分裂症的疗效证据有限,但仍被用于临床。为了探究从联合用药转换为单一疗法的效果,我们对PROACTIVE(预防精神分裂症复发:口服抗精神病药物与注射用药物比较:评估疗效)研究数据进行了探索性分析,该研究中305例精神分裂症和分裂情感性障碍患者被随机分配接受长效注射用利培酮或第二代口服抗精神病药物(OA)治疗,并随访30个月。

方法

比较进入PROACTIVE研究的联合用药组(n = 50)、长效注射用药物组(n = 20)或口服抗精神病药物组(n = 206)患者的复发时间和临床指标。

结果

在基线时,口服抗精神病药物组的住院次数显著少于联合用药组(P = 0.009)。联合用药组中68%的患者复发,长效注射用药物组为53%,口服抗精神病药物组为52%。虽然χ检验显示各组复发率无显著差异(χ = 3.85,P = 0.146),但对数秩检验显示各组首次复发时间有显著差异(χ = 6.81,P = 0.033),口服抗精神病药物组的复发时间(平均562.8天)显著长于联合用药组(平均409.5天;P = 0.011)。长效注射用药物组的首次复发平均时间(594天)与其他组无显著差异。然而,在校正住院次数后,组间差异不再显著(风险比,1.541;P = 0.052)。

结论

基于我们的探索性分析结果,联合使用抗精神病药物预示着更早复发,在精神分裂症治疗中需要更多的治疗指导。

相似文献

1
Combination Antipsychotic Therapies: An Analysis From a Longitudinal Pragmatic Trial.
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2017 Oct;37(5):595-599. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000000766.
2
Oral versus injectable antipsychotic treatment in early psychosis: post hoc comparison of two studies.
Clin Ther. 2008 Dec;30(12):2378-86. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.12.020.
3
Comparison of Injectable and Oral Antipsychotics in Relapse Rates in a Pragmatic 30-Month Schizophrenia Relapse Prevention Study.
Psychiatr Serv. 2016 Dec 1;67(12):1370-1372. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201500466. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
4
Comparison of SGA oral medications and a long-acting injectable SGA: the PROACTIVE study.
Schizophr Bull. 2015 Mar;41(2):449-59. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbu067. Epub 2014 May 27.
8
Influence of antipsychotic treatment type and regimen on the functionality of patients with schizophrenia.
Nord J Psychiatry. 2014 Apr;68(3):180-8. doi: 10.3109/08039488.2013.790475. Epub 2013 May 15.
9
Predicting relapse with residual symptoms in schizophrenia: A secondary analysis of the PROACTIVE trial.
Schizophr Res. 2020 Jan;215:173-180. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2019.10.037. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
10
Continuation of schizophrenia treatment with three long-acting injectable antipsychotics in South Korea: A nationwide population-based study.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2019 Sep;29(9):1051-1060. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2019.07.138. Epub 2019 Jul 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Decellularization of various tissues and organs through chemical methods.
Tissue Cell. 2024 Dec;91:102573. doi: 10.1016/j.tice.2024.102573. Epub 2024 Oct 5.
3
Antipsychotic Polypharmacy.
Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ). 2020 Oct;18(4):375-385. doi: 10.1176/appi.focus.20190047. Epub 2020 Nov 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Validation of the Scale of Functioning in Older Outpatients With Schizophrenia.
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1996;4(3):218-228. doi: 10.1097/00019442-199622430-00005. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
3
Frequency and correlates of antipsychotic polypharmacy among patients with schizophrenia in Denmark: A nation-wide pharmacoepidemiological study.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2015 Oct;25(10):1669-76. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.04.027. Epub 2015 May 7.
4
Comparison of SGA oral medications and a long-acting injectable SGA: the PROACTIVE study.
Schizophr Bull. 2015 Mar;41(2):449-59. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbu067. Epub 2014 May 27.
5
Safety and tolerability of antipsychotic polypharmacy.
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2012 Jul;11(4):527-42. doi: 10.1517/14740338.2012.683523. Epub 2012 May 8.
8
The evolution of antipsychotic switch and polypharmacy in natural practice--a longitudinal perspective.
Schizophr Res. 2011 Aug;130(1-3):40-6. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2011.05.013. Epub 2011 May 31.
9
Effectiveness of switching from antipsychotic polypharmacy to monotherapy.
Am J Psychiatry. 2011 Jul;168(7):702-8. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.10060908. Epub 2011 May 2.
10
Schizophrenia treatment guidelines in the United States.
Clin Schizophr Relat Psychoses. 2011 Apr;5(1):40-9. doi: 10.3371/CSRP.5.1.6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验