Suppr超能文献

AO脊柱分类系统(下颈椎、胸腰椎)

AOSpine Classification Systems (Subaxial, Thoracolumbar).

作者信息

Schnake Klaus J, Schroeder Gregory D, Vaccaro Alexander R, Oner Cumhur

机构信息

*Center for Spine and Scoliosis Surgery, Schön Klinik Nürnberg Fürth, Fürth, Germany; †Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA; and ‡Department of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Orthop Trauma. 2017 Sep;31 Suppl 4:S14-S23. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000947.

Abstract

Numerous classification systems for subaxial and thoracolumbar spine injuries were proposed in the past with the attempt to facilitate communication between physicians. The AO-Magerl, thoracolumbar system, and Subaxial Cervical Spine Injury Classification systems are all well known, but did not achieve universal international adoption. A group of international experienced spine trauma surgeons were brought together by AOSpine with the goal to develop a comprehensive yet simple classification system for spinal trauma. This article is a synopsis of the proposed subaxial and thoracolumbar classification systems. In several studies, this classification system was developed using an iterative consensus process among the clinical experts in sufficient number and quality of DICOM images of real cases searching for meaningful and reproducible patterns. Both systems are based on 3 injury morphology types: compression injuries (A), tension band injuries (B), and translational injuries (C) with a total of 9 subgroups. In the subaxial cervical spine 4 additional subtypes for facet injuries exist. Patient-specific modifiers and neurologic status were also included to aid surgeons in therapeutic decision making. The proposed classification systems for subaxial and thoracolumbar injuries showed substantial intraobserver and interobserver reliability (κ = 0.64-0.85) for grading fracture type. Grading for the subtypes varied considerably due to the low frequency of certain injury subtypes among other reasons. In summary, the AOSpine thoracolumbar and subaxial cervical spine injury systems show substantial reliability, thus being valuable tools for clinical and research purposes.

摘要

过去人们提出了许多用于下颈椎和胸腰椎损伤的分类系统,旨在促进医生之间的交流。AO-Magerl分类系统、胸腰椎分类系统和下颈椎损伤分类系统都广为人知,但并未在国际上得到普遍采用。AO脊柱学会召集了一批经验丰富的国际脊柱创伤外科医生,目标是开发一个全面而简单的脊柱创伤分类系统。本文是拟议的下颈椎和胸腰椎分类系统的概述。在几项研究中,该分类系统是通过临床专家之间的迭代共识过程开发的,使用了足够数量和质量的真实病例DICOM图像,以寻找有意义且可重复的模式。这两个系统都基于3种损伤形态类型:压缩伤(A)、张力带损伤(B)和平移伤(C),共有9个亚组。在下颈椎,还有4种小关节损伤的额外亚型。还纳入了患者特异性修饰因素和神经功能状态,以帮助外科医生进行治疗决策。拟议的下颈椎和胸腰椎损伤分类系统在骨折类型分级方面显示出较高的观察者内和观察者间可靠性(κ=0.64-0.85)。由于某些损伤亚型的发生率较低等原因,亚型分级差异较大。总之,AO脊柱学会的胸腰椎和下颈椎损伤系统显示出较高的可靠性,因此是临床和研究的宝贵工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验