From the Department of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital Yun-lin Branch, Douliu (S.W.H.); Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei, Taiwan (C.Y.T.); Departments of Urology (Y.S.P., C.Y.H.) and Internal Medicine (K.L.C.), National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City; Department of Public Health, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan (P.C.C.); and Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei City (J.W., K.L.C.).
Hypertension. 2017 Oct;70(4):721-728. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.09669. Epub 2017 Aug 21.
Although shock wave lithotripsy is minimally invasive, earlier studies argued that it may increase patients' subsequent risk of hypertension and diabetes mellitus. This study evaluated the association between shock wave lithotripsy and new-onset hypertension or diabetes mellitus. The Taiwanese National Health Insurance Research Database was used to identify 20 219 patients aged 18 to 65 years who underwent the first stone surgical treatment (shock wave lithotripsy or ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy) between January 1999 and December 2011. A Cox proportional model was applied to evaluate associations. Time-varying Cox models were applied to evaluate the association between the number of shock wave lithotripsy sessions and the incidence of hypertension or diabetes mellitus. After a median follow-up of 74.9 and 82.6 months, 2028 and 688 patients developed hypertension in the shock wave lithotripsy and ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy groups, respectively. Patients who underwent shock wave lithotripsy had a higher probability of developing hypertension than patients who underwent ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy, with a hazard ratio of 1.20 (95% confidence interval, 1.10-1.31) after adjusting for covariates. The risk increased as the number of shock wave lithotripsy sessions increased. However, the diabetes mellitus risk was similar in the shock wave lithotripsy and ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy groups. Furthermore, the hazard ratio did not increase as the number of shock wave lithotripsy sessions increased. Shock wave lithotripsy consistently increased the incidence of hypertension on long-term follow-up. Therefore, alternatives to urolithiasis treatment (eg, endoscopic surgery or medical expulsion therapy) could avoid the hypertension risk. Furthermore, avoiding multiple sessions of shock wave lithotripsy could also evade the hypertension risk.
尽管体外冲击波碎石术具有微创性,但早期研究认为,它可能会增加患者后续患高血压和糖尿病的风险。本研究评估了体外冲击波碎石术与新发高血压或糖尿病之间的关联。研究使用台湾全民健康保险研究数据库,确定了 1999 年 1 月至 2011 年 12 月间年龄在 18 至 65 岁之间接受首次结石手术治疗(体外冲击波碎石术或输尿管镜碎石术)的 20219 例患者。应用 Cox 比例风险模型评估相关性。应用时变 Cox 模型评估体外冲击波碎石术次数与高血压或糖尿病发病率之间的关系。中位随访时间为 74.9 和 82.6 个月后,体外冲击波碎石术和输尿管镜碎石术组分别有 2028 和 688 例患者发生高血压。校正混杂因素后,行体外冲击波碎石术的患者发生高血压的概率高于行输尿管镜碎石术的患者,风险比为 1.20(95%置信区间,1.10-1.31)。随着体外冲击波碎石术次数的增加,风险增加。然而,两组的糖尿病发病风险相似。此外,随着体外冲击波碎石术次数的增加,风险比没有增加。体外冲击波碎石术在长期随访中持续增加高血压的发病率。因此,替代尿路结石治疗的方法(如内镜手术或药物排石治疗)可避免高血压风险。此外,避免多次体外冲击波碎石术也可避免高血压风险。