Schadendorf Dirk, Wolchok Jedd D, Hodi F Stephen, Chiarion-Sileni Vanna, Gonzalez Rene, Rutkowski Piotr, Grob Jean-Jacques, Cowey C Lance, Lao Christopher D, Chesney Jason, Robert Caroline, Grossmann Kenneth, McDermott David, Walker Dana, Bhore Rafia, Larkin James, Postow Michael A
Dirk Schadendorf, University Hospital Essen and the German Cancer Consortium, Essen, Germany; Jedd D. Wolchok and Michael A. Postow, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Michael A. Postow, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; F. Stephen Hodi, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; David McDermott, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Vanna Chiarion-Sileni, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, Veneto, Italy; Rene Gonzalez, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO; Piotr Rutkowski, Maria Skłodowska Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland; Jean-Jacques Grob, Aix-Marseille Université, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille Timone, Marseille; Caroline Robert, Gustave Roussy and Université Paris-Sud, Paris, France; C. Lance Cowey, Texas Oncology-Baylor Cancer Center, Dallas, TX; Christopher D. Lao, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Jason Chesney, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY; Kenneth Grossmann, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT; Dana Walker and Rafia Bhore, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ; and James Larkin, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 1;35(34):3807-3814. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.73.2289. Epub 2017 Aug 25.
Purpose Approximately 40% of patients with advanced melanoma who received nivolumab combined with ipilimumab in clinical trials discontinued treatment because of adverse events (AEs). We conducted a retrospective analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients who discontinued treatment because of AEs. Methods Data were pooled from phase II and III trials of patients who received nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg, every 3 weeks for four doses, followed by nivolumab monotherapy 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks (N = 409). Efficacy was assessed in all randomly assigned patients who discontinued because of AEs during the induction phase (n = 96) and in those who did not discontinue because of AEs (n = 233). Safety was assessed in treated patients who discontinued because of AEs (n = 176) at any time and in those who did not discontinue because of AEs (n = 231). Results At a minimum follow-up of 18 months, median progression-free survival was 8.4 months for patients who discontinued treatment because of AEs during the induction phase and 10.8 months for patients who did not discontinue because of AEs ( P = .97). Median overall survival had not been reached in either group ( P = .23). The objective response rate was 58.3% for patients who discontinued because of AEs during the induction phase and 50.2% for patients who did not discontinue. The vast majority of grade 3 or 4 AEs occurred during the induction phase, with most resolving after appropriate management. Conclusion Efficacy outcomes seemed similar between patients who discontinued nivolumab plus ipilimumab treatment because of AEs during the induction phase and those who did not discontinue because of AEs. Therefore, even after discontinuation, many patients may continue to derive benefit from combination therapy.
目的 在临床试验中,约40%接受纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹木单抗治疗的晚期黑色素瘤患者因不良事件(AE)而中断治疗。我们进行了一项回顾性分析,以评估因AE而中断治疗的患者接受纳武利尤单抗加伊匹木单抗治疗的疗效和安全性。方法 汇总来自II期和III期试验的数据,这些试验的患者接受1 mg/kg纳武利尤单抗加3 mg/kg伊匹木单抗,每3周一次,共四剂,随后每2周接受3 mg/kg纳武利尤单抗单药治疗(N = 409)。对所有在诱导期因AE而中断治疗的随机分组患者(n = 96)和未因AE而中断治疗的患者(n = 233)进行疗效评估。对在任何时间因AE而中断治疗的接受治疗患者(n = 176)和未因AE而中断治疗的患者(n = 231)进行安全性评估。结果 在至少18个月的随访中,诱导期因AE而中断治疗的患者的无进展生存期中位数为8.4个月,未因AE而中断治疗的患者为10.8个月(P = 0.97)。两组的总生存期中位数均未达到(P = 0.23)。诱导期因AE而中断治疗的患者的客观缓解率为58.3%,未中断治疗的患者为50.2%。绝大多数3级或4级AE发生在诱导期,大多数在适当处理后缓解。结论 诱导期因AE而中断纳武利尤单抗加伊匹木单抗治疗的患者与未因AE而中断治疗的患者的疗效结果似乎相似。因此,即使中断治疗后,许多患者可能仍能从联合治疗中继续获益。