Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Truven Health Analytics, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Headache. 2017 Oct;57(9):1399-1408. doi: 10.1111/head.13157. Epub 2017 Aug 26.
To describe prophylactic and acute medication treatment patterns, including timing, medication type, and duration of use in migraine patients initiating prophylaxis.
Patients with migraine can be treated with acute and prophylactic therapies. Current treatment options for migraine prophylaxis are associated with poor tolerability and low adherence and persistence.
This retrospective cohort study used the Truven Health Analytics MarketScan Research Databases to identify adults in the United States with a migraine diagnosis who initiated migraine prophylactic medication (index event) between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2011. Prescribed prophylactic medications evaluated included topiramate, beta-blockers, and tricyclic antidepressants. Patients were required to have 12 months of pre- and post-index continuous enrollment. Patient characteristics, migraine-specific prescribed prophylactic treatment patterns (including gaps in therapy, treatment switches, and additions of index medications), and prescribed acute medication utilization were assessed.
The study population comprised 107,122 patients, with 52,275 (49%) initiating topiramate, 22,658 (21%) initiating beta-blockers, and 32,189 (30%) initiating tricyclic antidepressants. Mean (SD) age was 41 (12) years and 83% were female. Persistence with migraine prophylactic medication was low; 81% of patients had gaps of >90 days in their migraine prophylaxis in the first year. The gap in therapy occurred early in treatment (mean, 95 days), and only 10% of patients restarted prophylactic therapy within that year. Switching from index medication to another prophylactic medication or adding prophylaxis was uncommon (13% and 5%, respectively). One year after initiating prophylaxis, 65% of patients were not receiving any prophylactic therapies. Most patients initiating migraine prophylaxis also utilized acute treatments (81%); opioid use was more frequent than triptan use (53% vs 48%) and was common (40%) among patients without other chronic pain conditions (eg, arthritis, fibromyalgia, and lower back pain).
Patients with migraine who initiated prophylactic therapy had poor persistence with early gaps in therapy, were unlikely to switch prophylactic treatments, and most discontinued prophylaxis by the end of the first year.
描述偏头痛患者预防治疗的模式,包括预防治疗开始时的用药时间、药物类型和使用时长。
偏头痛患者可接受急性和预防治疗。目前偏头痛预防治疗的选择与较差的耐受性和低依从性及持久性相关。
本回顾性队列研究使用 Truven Health Analytics MarketScan 研究数据库,在美国 2008 年 1 月 1 日至 2011 年 12 月 31 日期间,确定了偏头痛诊断的成年人患者,这些患者开始使用偏头痛预防药物(索引事件)。评估的处方预防药物包括托吡酯、β-受体阻滞剂和三环类抗抑郁药。患者需要有 12 个月的索引前和索引后的连续入组。评估患者特征、偏头痛特定处方预防治疗模式(包括治疗中断、治疗转换和索引药物的添加)和处方急性药物使用情况。
该研究人群包括 107122 例患者,其中 52275 例(49%)开始使用托吡酯,22658 例(21%)开始使用β-受体阻滞剂,32189 例(30%)开始使用三环类抗抑郁药。平均(SD)年龄为 41(12)岁,83%为女性。偏头痛预防药物的持续性较低;在第一年中,81%的患者偏头痛预防药物中断时间超过 90 天。治疗中断发生较早(平均 95 天),且只有 10%的患者在那一年重新开始预防治疗。从索引药物转换为另一种预防药物或添加预防药物的情况并不常见(分别为 13%和 5%)。开始预防治疗一年后,65%的患者未接受任何预防治疗。开始偏头痛预防治疗的大多数患者也使用了急性治疗药物(81%);阿片类药物的使用频率高于曲坦类药物(53%比 48%),在没有其他慢性疼痛疾病(如关节炎、纤维肌痛和下腰痛)的患者中较为常见(40%)。
开始预防治疗的偏头痛患者治疗中断的早期持续性较差,不太可能转换预防治疗,大多数患者在第一年结束时停止预防治疗。