Okubo Yusuke, Michihata Nobuaki, Morisaki Naho, Hangai Mayumi, Matsui Hiroki, Fushimi Kiyohide, Yasunaga Hideo
Department of Epidemiology, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, USA.
Department of Social Medicine, National Center for Child Health and Development, 2-10-1 Okura, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, 1578535, Japan.
Int J Hematol. 2018 Jan;107(1):75-82. doi: 10.1007/s12185-017-2322-1. Epub 2017 Aug 28.
The clinical benefits and practice patterns of different pharmacologic regimes in acute pediatric immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) remain unclear in Japan. Using a national inpatient database, we analyzed recent trends in practice patterns for acute pediatric ITP, and compared risks of 6-month readmission, total hospitalization costs, and lengths of hospital stay between ITP children treated with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and corticosteroid, using inverse probability weighting analyses. From 2010 to 2014, the proportions of IVIG use increased from 43.4 to 66.0% (P < 0.001), while the proportions of corticosteroid use and watchful waiting decreased from 16.4 to 10% and from 28.6 to 14.3%, respectively (P < 0.001). No significant difference in 6-month readmission risk was observed between IVIG and corticosteroid (p = 0.28). Total length of hospital stay in the corticosteroid group was 3.5 days longer than that in IVIG (95% confidence interval, 2.1-4.6 days), whereas total hospitalization cost was greater in IVIG than in corticosteroid (difference, ¥ 207,994; 95% confidence interval, ¥ 149586-¥ 280728). A trend toward increased IVIG use was observed during the study period. Total hospitalization cost was considerably greater in the IVIG than in the corticosteroid group, whereas readmission risks were similar in both groups.
在日本,不同药物治疗方案用于急性小儿免疫性血小板减少症(ITP)的临床益处和实践模式仍不明确。我们利用全国住院患者数据库,分析了急性小儿ITP的近期实践模式趋势,并采用逆概率加权分析方法,比较了接受静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG)和皮质类固醇治疗的ITP患儿6个月再入院风险、总住院费用和住院时长。2010年至2014年,IVIG的使用比例从43.4%增至66.0%(P < 0.001),而皮质类固醇的使用比例和观察等待比例分别从16.4%降至10%、从28.6%降至14.3%(P < 0.001)。IVIG和皮质类固醇治疗的患儿在6个月再入院风险方面未观察到显著差异(p = 0.28)。皮质类固醇组的总住院时长比IVIG组长3.5天(95%置信区间为2.1 - 4.6天),而IVIG组的总住院费用高于皮质类固醇组(差值为207,994日元;95%置信区间为149,586日元 - 280,728日元)。在研究期间观察到IVIG使用有增加趋势。IVIG组的总住院费用显著高于皮质类固醇组,而两组的再入院风险相似。