Suppr超能文献

关节切开术或关节镜治疗脓毒性膝关节炎的 30 天内相似并发症:美国外科医师学会国家手术质量改进计划分析。

Similar 30-Day Complications for Septic Knee Arthritis Treated With Arthrotomy or Arthroscopy: An American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, U.S.A.

Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, U.S.A..

出版信息

Arthroscopy. 2018 Jan;34(1):213-219. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.06.046. Epub 2017 Aug 31.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of the current study was to use the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) to determine whether there were differences in 30-day perioperative complications between open arthrotomy and arthroscopy for the treatment of septic knees in a large national sample.

METHODS

Patients who were diagnosed with a septic knee and underwent open arthrotomy or arthroscopy were identified in the 2005-2014 NSQIP data sets. Patient demographics and perioperative complications were characterized and compared between the 2 procedures.

RESULTS

In total, 168 patients undergoing knee arthrotomy and 216 patients undergoing knee arthroscopy for septic knee were identified. There were no statistically significant differences in demographic variables between the 2 groups. On univariate analysis, the rate of minor adverse events (MAEs; 15.48% vs 8.80%, P = .043) was higher in the open arthrotomy treatment group, while the rate of serious adverse events (SAEs; 37.50% vs 26.19%, P = .019) was higher in the arthroscopic surgery treatment group. On multivariate analysis, which controlled for patient characteristics/comorbidities and used the Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons, there were no statistically significant differences in risk of any adverse events (relative risk [RR] = 0.851; 99% confidence interval [CI], 0.598-1.211; P = .240), MAE (RR = 1.653; 99% CI, 0.818-3.341; P = .066), SAE (RR = 0.706; 99% CI, 0.471-1.058; P = .027), return to the operating room (RR = 0.810; 99% CI, 0.433-1.516; P = .387), or readmission (RR = 1.022; 99% CI, 0.456-2.294; P = .944) between open compared with arthroscopic surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Univariate analysis revealed a lower rate of MAE but a higher rate of SAE in the arthroscopic surgery treatment group. However, on multivariate analysis, similar perioperative complications, rate of return to the operating room, and rate of readmission were found after open and arthroscopic debridement for septic knees. Based on the lack of demonstrated superiority of either of these 2 treatment modalities for this given diagnosis, and the expectation that most differences in perioperative complications for this diagnosis would have declared themselves within the first 30 days, deciding between the studied treatment modalities may be based more on other factors not included in this study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective comparative study, Level III.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在利用美国外科医师学会国家手术质量改进计划(NSQIP),在大型全国样本中,确定开放性关节切开术和关节镜治疗脓毒性膝关节患者在 30 天围手术期并发症方面是否存在差异。

方法

在 2005 年至 2014 年的 NSQIP 数据集中,确定了诊断为脓毒性膝关节并接受开放性关节切开术或关节镜治疗的患者。对 2 种手术的患者人口统计学和围手术期并发症进行了描述和比较。

结果

共确定了 168 例接受膝关节关节切开术和 216 例接受膝关节关节镜检查治疗脓毒性膝关节的患者。2 组患者的人口统计学变量无统计学差异。单因素分析显示,小不良事件(MAE;15.48%比 8.80%,P=.043)发生率在开放性关节切开术治疗组较高,而严重不良事件(SAE;37.50%比 26.19%,P=.019)发生率在关节镜手术治疗组较高。多因素分析中,控制了患者特征/合并症,并对多次比较进行了 Bonferroni 校正,任何不良事件的风险(相对风险 [RR]0.851;99%置信区间 [CI]0.598-1.211;P=.240)、MAE(RR 1.653;99%CI0.818-3.341;P=.066)、SAE(RR 0.706;99%CI0.471-1.058;P=.027)、返回手术室(RR 0.810;99%CI0.433-1.516;P=.387)或再入院(RR 1.022;99%CI0.456-2.294;P=.944)无统计学差异,与开放性手术相比,关节镜手术的 RR 值较低。

结论

单因素分析显示,关节镜手术治疗组 MAE 发生率较低,但 SAE 发生率较高。然而,多因素分析显示,对于脓毒性膝关节,开放性和关节镜清创术后的围手术期并发症、返回手术室和再入院率相似。基于这两种治疗方法在该诊断中的优势均未得到证实,并且预期该诊断的围手术期并发症大多数会在 30 天内显现出来,因此在研究的治疗方法之间做出决定可能更多地基于本研究未包含的其他因素。

证据水平

回顾性比较研究,III 级。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验