Orikiriza Patrick, Nyehangane Dan, Atwine Daniel, Kisakye John J, Kassaza Kennedy, Amumpaire Juliet-Mwanga, Boum Yap
Epicentre Mbarara Research Centre, Mbarara, Uganda.
Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
Afr J Lab Med. 2017 Mar 31;6(2):383. doi: 10.4102/ajlm.v6i2.383. eCollection 2017.
To confirm presence of complex, some tuberculosis culture laboratories still rely on para-nitrobenzoic acid (PNB), a traditional technique that requires sub-culturing of clinical isolates and two to three weeks to give results. Rapid identification tests have improved turnaround times for mycobacterial culture results. Considering the challenges of the PNB method, we assessed the performance of the SD Bioline TB Ag MPT64 assay by using PNB as gold standard to detect complex from acid-fast bacilli (AFB) positive cultures.
The aim of this study was to determine the sensitivity, specificity and turnaround time of the SD MPT64 assay for identification of complex, in a setting with high prevalence of tuberculosis and HIV.
A convenience sample of 690 patients, with tuberculosis symptoms, was enrolled at Epicentre Mbarara Research Centre between April 2010 and June 2011. The samples were decontaminated using NALC-NaOH and re-suspended sediments inoculated in Mycobacterium Growth Indicator Tubes (MGIT) media, then incubated at 37 °C for a maximum of eight weeks. A random sample of 50 known negative cultures and 50 non-tuberculous mycobacteria isolates were tested for specificity, while sensitivity was based on AFB positivity. The time required from positive culture to reporting of results was also assessed with PNB used as the gold standard.
Of the 138 cultures that were AFB-positive, the sensitivity of the SD MPT64 assay was 100.0% [95% CI: 97.3 - 100] and specificity was 100.0% (95% CI, 96.4 - 100). The median time from a specimen receipt to confirmation of strain was 10 days [IQR: 8-12] with SD MPT64 and 24 days [IQR: 22-26] with PNB.
The SD MPT64 assay is comparable to PNB for identification of complex and reduces the time to detection.
为确认结核分枝杆菌复合群的存在,一些结核病培养实验室仍依赖对氨基苯甲酸(PNB),这是一种传统技术,需要对临床分离株进行传代培养,且需要两到三周才能得出结果。快速鉴定试验缩短了分枝杆菌培养结果的周转时间。考虑到PNB方法存在的问题,我们以PNB作为金标准,评估了SD Bioline TB Ag MPT64检测法从抗酸杆菌(AFB)阳性培养物中检测结核分枝杆菌复合群的性能。
本研究旨在确定在结核病和艾滋病毒高流行环境中,SD MPT64检测法鉴定结核分枝杆菌复合群的敏感性、特异性和周转时间。
2010年4月至2011年6月期间,在姆巴拉拉震中研究中心选取了690例有结核病症状的患者作为便利样本。样本用NALC-NaOH进行去污处理,将重新悬浮的沉淀物接种到分枝杆菌生长指示管(MGIT)培养基中,然后在37℃下培养最多8周。对50份已知阴性培养物和50份非结核分枝杆菌分离株的随机样本进行特异性检测,而敏感性基于AFB阳性情况。还以PNB作为金标准,评估了从阳性培养物到报告结果所需的时间。
在138份AFB阳性培养物中,SD MPT64检测法的敏感性为100.0%[95%CI:97.3 - 100],特异性为100.0%(95%CI,96.4 - 100)。使用SD MPT64检测法,从样本接收到菌株确认的中位时间为10天[IQR:8 - 12],而使用PNB为24天[IQR:22 - 26]。
在鉴定结核分枝杆菌复合群方面,SD MPT64检测法与PNB相当,且缩短了检测时间。