Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Allied Medical Professions, University of the Philippines Manila, UP Manila Compound, Pedro Gil St., Malate, 1004, Manila, NCR, Philippines.
Occupational Therapy Section, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Philippine Orthopedic Center, Ma. Clara Cor. Banawe Sts., Brgy. Lourdes, 1114, Quezon City, NCR, Philippines.
J Occup Rehabil. 2018 Jun;28(2):201-214. doi: 10.1007/s10926-017-9732-z.
Purpose This review aims to map the scope of published research on occupational therapy (OT) interventions and pertinent work and work-related outcomes for persons with occupational injuries and diseases. Methods The scoping review adapted Arksey and O'Malley's framework. Six electronic databases were searched. Ancestral search was also done on five systematic reviews. The search was conducted from September 2015 to October 2015. Interventions and outcomes were coded using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Core Set for Vocational Rehabilitation to plot trends. Results Forty-six articles were included in the review. The top five intervention approaches included: acquiring skills (12.27%), health services, systems, and policies (10.43%), products and technology for employment (9.20%), handling stress and other psychological demands (7.98%), and apprenticeship (6.74%). The top five outcomes targeted included: remunerative employment (15.71%); sensation of pain (10.99%); emotional functions (5.76%); handling stress and other psychological demands (5.76%); economic self-sufficiency (4.71%); muscle endurance functions (4.71%); exercise tolerance functions (4.71%); undertaking multiple tasks (4.19%); acquiring, keeping, and terminating a job (4.19%); and looking after one's health (4.19%). Conclusion The trend in interventions show the use of activities and environment facilitators which are attuned to the conceptual nature of OT. Furthermore, the trend in outcomes show that there is substantial evidence that supports the use of OT to target work. This review may provide a platform for collaboration with other professionals and also help identify research directions to strengthen the evidence base for OT in work-related practice.
目的 本综述旨在绘制职业治疗(OT)干预措施以及与职业伤害和疾病患者的工作和与工作相关的结果的研究范围。
方法 本范围综述采用了 Arksey 和 O'Malley 的框架。共检索了六个电子数据库,并对五项系统综述进行了追溯性检索。检索时间为 2015 年 9 月至 2015 年 10 月。使用国际功能、残疾和健康分类核心组进行干预和结果编码,以绘制趋势。
结果 共有 46 篇文章纳入综述。排名前五的干预方法包括:获得技能(12.27%)、卫生服务、系统和政策(10.43%)、就业产品和技术(9.20%)、应对压力和其他心理需求(7.98%)和学徒制(6.74%)。排名前五的结果目标包括:有酬就业(15.71%)、疼痛感觉(10.99%)、情绪功能(5.76%)、应对压力和其他心理需求(5.76%)、经济自给自足(4.71%)、肌肉耐力功能(4.71%)、运动耐量功能(4.71%)、完成多项任务(4.19%)、获得、保持和终止工作(4.19%)以及照顾自己的健康(4.19%)。
结论 干预措施的趋势表明,OT 采用了与活动和环境促进者相关的概念性质。此外,结果趋势表明,有大量证据支持使用 OT 来针对工作。本综述可能为与其他专业人员合作提供平台,并有助于确定研究方向,以加强 OT 在与工作相关实践中的证据基础。