Ehlinger M, D'Ambrosio A, Vie P, Leclerc S, Bonnomet F, Bonnevialle P, Lustig S, Parratte S, Colmar M, Argenson J-N
Service de chirurgie orthopédique et de traumatologie, hôpital de Hautepierre, 1, avenue Molière, 67098 Strasbourg cedex, France.
Service de chirurgie orthopédique et de traumatologie, hôpital de Hautepierre, 1, avenue Molière, 67098 Strasbourg cedex, France.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Nov;103(7):1035-1039. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.07.011. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
High tibial osteotomy (HTO) is effective in treating isolated medial osteoarthritis of the knee, but subsequent deterioration is inevitable, and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is then an option. The present study sought to compare TKA following medial opening-wedge HTO (OW-HTO) versus lateral closing-wedge HTO (CW-HTO) in terms of intraoperative data and clinical results. The study hypothesis was that there is no significant difference in clinical results or complications in TKA following OW-HTO or CW-HTO.
A retrospective multicenter (9 centers) study was conducted for the French Society of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology (SoFCOT), including 135 TKAs following HTO (58 OW and 77 CW) at a minimum 5 years' follow-up. Mean interval between HTO and TKA was 134 months and was longer in case of CW-HTO (P<0.0001). Mean age at TKA was 65.4 years and older in case of CW-HTO (P=0.021). Tibial slope was greater in case of OW-HTO (P=0.024). Prior to TKA, 55.7% of patients could walk without canes, 98.4% found stairs difficult or impossible and only 19.1% could manage a walking distance greater than 1000m. Mean flexion was 110°; 54.2% of patients showed frontal knee stability and 87.8% sagittal stability; 60.1% had a mechanical axis in varus, without difference according to OW- or CW-HTO.
Hardware was almost systematically removed (in 98.5% of cases): in the same step for OW-HTO (P=0.018) or often in 2 steps for CW-HTO. The primary approach was generally re-used (54.2%), but less frequently in the CW-HTO group (P=0.0004). Lateral or medial ligament release was not associated in respectively 78.2% and 79.7% of cases. The TKA implant was usually without stem (87.2%) and was fitted using a conventional technique (74.4%). At a mean 87 months' follow-up, 78.5% of patients could walk without canes, stairs were still difficult or impossible for 67%, and 74.1% could now walk further than 1000m; mean flexion was 110.5°. Overall, 91.5% of patients showed frontal knee stability and 98.2% sagittal stability, without difference according to OW- or CW-HTO. There were 15 complications within 3 months, more often in the OW-HTO group (12.3%) although not significantly, and with no difference in severity. Late complications comprised loosening (5.5%) and infection (3.6%) and were more frequent in the CW-HTO group (12%) (P<0.05).
The study hypothesis was partially confirmed. The only technical differences concerned hardware removal, often performed in two steps in case of CW-HTO, and TKA approach, which differed from the primary approach in case of CW-HTO. Clinical results were comparable between OW- and CW-HTO, but late complications were more frequent in the CW-HTO group.
III; comparative retrospective study.
高位胫骨截骨术(HTO)在治疗膝关节单纯内侧骨关节炎方面有效,但随后病情恶化不可避免,全膝关节置换术(TKA)则是一种选择。本研究旨在比较内侧开口楔形HTO(OW-HTO)与外侧闭合楔形HTO(CW-HTO)术后TKA的术中数据和临床结果。研究假设为OW-HTO或CW-HTO术后TKA的临床结果或并发症无显著差异。
为法国骨科学与创伤外科学会(SoFCOT)开展了一项回顾性多中心(9个中心)研究,纳入135例HTO术后行TKA的患者(58例OW-HTO和77例CW-HTO),至少随访5年。HTO与TKA之间的平均间隔时间为134个月,CW-HTO患者的间隔时间更长(P<0.0001)。TKA时的平均年龄为65.4岁,CW-HTO患者的年龄更大(P=0.021)。OW-HTO患者的胫骨斜率更大(P=0.024)。在TKA之前,55.7%的患者可以不用拐杖行走,98.4%的患者觉得上楼梯困难或无法上楼梯,只有19.1%的患者能够行走超过1000米的距离。平均屈曲度为110°;54.2%的患者表现出膝关节额状面稳定性,87.8%表现出矢状面稳定性;60.1%的患者机械轴内翻,OW-HTO和CW-HTO之间无差异。
内植物几乎都被取出(98.5%的病例):OW-HTO在同一步骤取出(P=0.018),而CW-HTO通常分两步取出。通常采用原手术入路(54.2%),但CW-HTO组的频率较低(P=0.0004)。分别有78.2%和79.7%的病例未进行外侧或内侧韧带松解。TKA假体通常无柄(87.2%),采用传统技术安装(74.4%)。平均随访87个月时,78.5%的患者可以不用拐杖行走,67%的患者上楼梯仍然困难或无法上楼梯,74.1%的患者现在能够行走超过1000米;平均屈曲度为110.5°。总体而言,91.5%的患者表现出膝关节额状面稳定性,98.2%表现出矢状面稳定性,OW-HTO和CW-HTO之间无差异。3个月内有15例并发症,OW-HTO组更常见(12.3%),但差异无统计学意义,严重程度也无差异。晚期并发症包括松动(5.5%)和感染(3.6%),CW-HTO组更常见(12%)(P<0.05)。
研究假设得到部分证实。唯一的技术差异在于内植物取出,CW-HTO通常分两步进行,以及TKA入路,CW-HTO与原手术入路不同。OW-HTO和CW-HTO的临床结果相当,但CW-HTO组晚期并发症更常见。
III级;比较性回顾性研究。