Suppr超能文献

改良 Ashworth 量表的组内和组间可靠性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Inter- and intra-rater reliability of the Modified Ashworth Scale: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Physiotherapy, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain -

Department of Basic Psychology and Methodology, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.

出版信息

Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2018 Aug;54(4):576-590. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04796-7. Epub 2017 Sep 13.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Modified Ashworth Scale is the most widely clinical scale used to measure the increase of muscle tone. Reliability is not an immutable property of a scale and can vary as a function of the variability and composition of the sample to which it is administered. The best method to examine how the reliability of a test scores varies is by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of the reliability coefficients obtained in different applications of the test with the data at hand. The objectives of this systematic revision are: what is the mean inter- and intra-rater reliability of the Modified Ashworth Scale's scores in upper and lower extremities? Which study characteristics affect the reliability of the scores in this scale?

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

The PubMed, Embase and CINAHL databases were searched from 1987 to February 2015. Two reviewers independently selected empirical studies published in English or in Spanish that applied the Modified Ashworth Scale and reported any reliability coefficient with the data at hand in children, adolescents or adults with spasticity.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Thirty-three studies reported any reliability estimate of Modified Ashworth Scale scores (N.=1065 participants). For lower extremities and inter-rater agreement, the mean intraclass correlation was ICC+=0.686 (95% CI: 0.563 and 0.780) and for kappa coefficients, κ+=0.360 (95% CI: 0.241 and 0.468); for intra-rater agreement: ICC+=0.644 (95% CI: 0.543 and 0.726) and κ+=0.488 (95% CI: 0.370 and 0.591). For upper extremities and inter-rater agreement: ICC+=0.781 (95% CI: 0.679 and 0.853) and κ+=0.625 (95% CI: 0.350 and 0.801); for intra-rater agreement: ICC+=0.748 (95% CI: 0.671 and 0.809) and κ+=0.593 (95% CI: 0.467 and 0.696). The type of design, the study focus, and the number of raters presented statistically significant relationships with ICC both for lower and upper extremities.

CONCLUSIONS

Inter- and intra-rater agreement for Modified Ashworth Scale scores was satisfactory. Modified Ashworth Scale' scores exhibited better reliability when measuring upper extremities than lower. Several characteristics of the studies were statistically associated to inter-rater reliability of the scores for lower and upper extremities.

摘要

简介

改良 Ashworth 量表是最常用于测量肌肉张力增加的临床量表。可靠性不是量表的固有属性,它会随着应用于不同样本的变异性和组成而变化。检查测试分数可靠性变化的最佳方法是,根据手头的数据,对不同应用中获得的可靠性系数进行系统回顾和荟萃分析。本系统修订的目的是:上肢和下肢改良 Ashworth 量表评分的组内和组间平均可靠性是多少?哪些研究特征会影响该量表评分的可靠性?

证据采集

从 1987 年到 2015 年 2 月,我们检索了 PubMed、Embase 和 CINAHL 数据库。两名审查员独立选择了以英语或西班牙语发表的、应用改良 Ashworth 量表并报告了任何与手头数据相关的可靠性系数的实证研究,这些研究的对象是患有痉挛的儿童、青少年或成人。

证据综合

33 项研究报告了改良 Ashworth 量表评分的任何可靠性估计值(N=1065 名参与者)。对于下肢和组间一致性,组内相关系数 ICC+=0.686(95%CI:0.563 和 0.780),kappa 系数 κ+=0.360(95%CI:0.241 和 0.468);对于组内一致性:ICC+=0.644(95%CI:0.543 和 0.726)和 κ+=0.488(95%CI:0.370 和 0.591)。对于上肢和组间一致性:ICC+=0.781(95%CI:0.679 和 0.853)和 κ+=0.625(95%CI:0.350 和 0.801);对于组内一致性:ICC+=0.748(95%CI:0.671 和 0.809)和 κ+=0.593(95%CI:0.467 和 0.696)。设计类型、研究重点和评价者人数与改良 Ashworth 量表的 ICC 均呈显著统计学关系,上肢和下肢都是如此。

结论

改良 Ashworth 量表评分的组内和组间一致性令人满意。改良 Ashworth 量表评分在上肢测量中比在下肢测量中具有更好的可靠性。研究的几个特征与改良 Ashworth 量表评分的组间可靠性呈统计学相关,无论是在上肢还是下肢。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验