Indiana University, 302 Sycamore Hall, Bloomington, IN, USA.
J Youth Adolesc. 2017 Dec;46(12):2401-2406. doi: 10.1007/s10964-017-0741-1. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
Data sharing has come of age. Long expected as a professional courtesy but rarely honored, data sharing is now highlighted in codes of ethics, supported by research communities, required by leading funding organizations, and variously encouraged and mandated by journals and even publishers. These developments reveal how sharing generates many benefits, all of which go to the integrity of the scientific process. Yet, sharing remains a complex phenomenon. This Editorial explains the journal’s response to the publisher’s mandate to establish an appropriate data sharing policy for the Journal of Youth and Adolescence. It describes the need to balance the benefits of sharing with its costs for authors publishing in multidisciplinary, developmental science journals like this one. For this journal and at this time, that balance leads us to err on the side of caution, which means supporting those who created their data and not coercing public sharing as a condition for publishing. This approach recognizes authors’ reliance on a wide variety of data, the needs of differentially situated authors, the requirements of robust peer review, and the potential harms that can come from editors’ unilateral sharing mandates.
数据共享已经成熟。长期以来,数据共享被视为一种职业礼貌,但很少得到尊重,现在它被道德准则所强调,得到研究界的支持,被主要资助机构所要求,并得到期刊甚至出版商的不同程度的鼓励和授权。这些发展揭示了共享如何产生许多好处,所有这些都有助于科学过程的完整性。然而,共享仍然是一个复杂的现象。本社论解释了期刊对出版商为《青少年杂志》制定适当数据共享政策的回应。它描述了需要平衡共享的好处与在像这样的多学科、发展科学期刊上发表文章的作者所面临的成本。对于本期刊而言,在当前情况下,这种平衡促使我们谨慎行事,这意味着支持那些创建了数据的作者,而不是将公开共享作为出版的条件来强制要求。这种方法认识到作者对各种数据的依赖,不同处境作者的需求,稳健同行评审的要求,以及编辑单方面共享授权可能带来的潜在危害。